magicjuan
Player Valuation: £60m
Your “point” is that I must accept 1+1=3 in order to qualify as open-minded. That’s massively naive and downright silly.
It isn't. It is naive not to contemplate it, arrogant to dismiss it without consideration.
Your “point” is that I must accept 1+1=3 in order to qualify as open-minded. That’s massively naive and downright silly.
It isn't. It is naive not to contemplate it, arrogant to dismiss it without consideration.
I got no truck with @magicjuan, he seemed to be asking me to agree with something I found preposterous. I apologize to him. I'll stop being a prick from here on out.
I wasn’t lashing out. I was sincerely pointing out that you write nonsensically as shown above. “Pushing thinking into a 3rd dimensional method” and “the third element being the new identity of the sum”. That’s pure woo.
The man who was the inspiration for Indiana Jones, Otto Rahn, visited Tibet in the 1920s, whilst there he witnessed and photographed monks lifting huge boulders, their vibrational mass altered by 'singing bowls' used by other monks.
Think of an opera singer and a glass, the frequency of the voice alters the frequency of the glass to the point of shattering. Sound has an affect on matter, apply that to the moving of huge blocks as in the pyramids or the cutting of single stone monoliths such as those at Baalbeck down to Gobekli Tepe, even stories like Jericho's walls have a certain plausibility in this context.
Point being, nobody knows jack really and to vehemently dismiss theories as well as uphold them with closed minds keeps us static and nothing ever changes.
It’s an interesting looking debate, beyond my areas and levels of understanding, but you’re both great dignified posters. It’s like watching my parents fight!I got no truck with @magicjuan, he seemed to be asking me to agree with something I found preposterous. I apologize to him. I'll stop being a prick from here on out.

This is on the one hand true, but on the other hand implausible. If you could use sound waves to move large blocks of stone and the knowledge of how to do so was spread that far, we would still be using it today.
It’s an interesting looking debate, beyond my areas and levels of understanding, but you’re both great dignified posters. It’s like watching my parents fight! lol
This is on the one hand true, but on the other hand implausible. If you could use sound waves to move large blocks of stone and the knowledge of how to do so was spread that far, we would still be using it today.
Not necessarily, there are so many things we used to do but don't, or we've chosen not to, many different skills have been lost
ChurchIf you went to bed when you were told to you would have nothing to see and yourself to please...
In some cases yes, but you are talking about a skill that would be supremely useful for a task (building with stone / other heavy objects) that people have been doing fairly consistently for the past five or six thousand years and which would have all manner of other potential uses. The spread of sites where such things are said to have been used also covers several thousand miles (or much more than that if you bring the Incan / Olmec things in) and at least a thousand years, so its not as if we are talking about an invention that was jealously guarded (like paper, silk, hydraulic cement or greek fire) by one state and which might have been put at risk by the state failing.
Basically, if it existed it would still exist and the various things that do the same job - the science of mechanics, basically - would not exist.
http://www.thelivingmoon.com/44cosmic_wisdom/02files/Levitation03.html
the why could be for many reasons, my own thinking is suppression for authority or pure gain, think the way Tesla was dealt with.
That is my point though - you could "deal with" Tesla because he was one man.
To "deal with" this you would have had to suppress many men over a wide area in numerous separate states, without any real reason to do so and (to accept your monks as evidence for the moment) any real success. To even make such actions possible would presuppose international co-operation (as well as detailed knowledge of each other) of a kind that is probably impossible given the advantage that would accrue to the states that were left with this capability.