Conspiracy theories

[Dylan]

And I suppose the WEALTH of independent evidence in the source list is all NASA controlled as well?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Third-party_evidence_for_Apollo_Moon_landings

 

[McBain]

http://phys.org/news/2009-09-indian-satellite-moon-scientist.html

I would much rather trust that as a source, rather than the crackpot World News Daily Report you are citing. I mean come on, just look at their Hot Topics right now:

'Kanye West Prime Suspect in Kim K mugging'
'Mother sues hospital after flu turns her son gay'
'Man left toothless after explosion of his Samsung toothbrush'
'Police shoot white coal miner 5 times - the thought he was black'

You may as well have just cited the National Enquirer.

Regarding the pictures, just because you don't know what you are looking at, doesn't make the evidence presented invalid.

Well that proves absolutely nothing whatsoever. You do know the Chandrayaan-I craft broke down before it even got to the moon right?

 

[Goat]

So are we saying nobody landed on the moon?

 

[Dylan]

Well that proves absolutely nothing whatsoever. You do know the Chandrayaan-I craft broke down before it even got to the moon right?

Wrong. So, so wrong. From the article I linked:

"The images were among 70,000 taken by the Chandrayaan-I craft before the mission was aborted last weekend. Scientists blamed a computer malfunction for cutting communications with the orbiter."

Meaning the mission wasn't completed (as in the full scope of the mission, but long enough to photograph the site. It operated in orbit of the moon for almost a year.

And for crying out loud, do you even check your own sources?

Sage News own title is "North America's Trustworthy Source of Faux News"

Honestly.......

 

[McBain]

So are we saying nobody landed on the moon?

Mate, people can't even get into Space.

The ISS is actually underwater.

 

[McBain]

Wrong. So, so wrong. From the article I linked:

"The images were among 70,000 taken by the Chandrayaan-I craft before the mission was aborted last weekend. Scientists blamed a computer malfunction for cutting communications with the orbiter."

Meaning the mission wasn't completed (as in the full scope of the mission, but long enough to photograph the site. It operated in orbit of the moon for almost a year.

And for crying out loud, do you even check your own sources?

Sage News own title is "North America's Trustworthy Source of Faux News"

Honestly.......

You mean it's not as trustworthy as Wikipedia?

 

[Dylan]

You mean it's not as trustworthy as Wikipedia?

Wikipedia is only as trustworthy as its sources. And if you spent more than two minutes on google, you would find that out yourself.

 

[McBain]

Wikipedia is only as trustworthy as its sources. And if you spent more than two minutes on google, you would find that out yourself.

So anyone can edit Wikipedia?

 

[Dylan]

So anyone can edit Wikipedia?

Absolutely. But normally, for those edits to remain, they have to be sourced. Check the sources. It is very simple.

 

[GueyeBhoy]

So anyone can edit Wikipedia?

Just because anyone can change it doesn't mean you can't independently verify the information in it

 

[McBain]

Absolutely. But normally, for those edits to remain, they have to be sourced. Check the sources. It is very simple.

Ahh. Ok then.

Oh look at that.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Moon_landing_conspiracy_theories

 

[Dylan]

Ahh. Ok then.

Oh look at that.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Moon_landing_conspiracy_theories

I will extend you a courtesy you are not returning.

I will read through that.

 

[GueyeBhoy]

Ahh. Ok then.

Oh look at that.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Moon_landing_conspiracy_theories

Correct, the conspiracy theory exists. Doesn't mean it's true.
There are wiki pages for the Bible, doesn't mean it's true.

 

[McBain]

I will extend you a courtesy you are not returning.

I will read through that.

I already read the link you had linked.

A little disingenuous of you there Dylan but you do get that.

 

[McBain]

Correct, the conspiracy theory exists. Doesn't mean it's true.
There are wiki pages for the Bible, doesn't mean it's true.

So your saying information exists, but doesn't mean its true because you don't believe it.

Like... The Bible?