Lord Buckethead
Player Valuation: £35m
Remember when people used to be people rather than making deliberately themselves bio-hazards?Remember we we used to treat people like human beings rather than bio-hazards?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Remember when people used to be people rather than making deliberately themselves bio-hazards?Remember we we used to treat people like human beings rather than bio-hazards?
Till you need the booster, in september...
No one is deliberately making themselves a bio-hazard.Remember when people used to be people rather than making deliberately themselves bio-hazards?
30% - 50% initial studies show, definitely will help, but you could be vaccinated and still transmit the virus - just like those who choose not to have the jab - the passports are discriminatory, it's that simple.The jabs also reduce transmission, a lot.
No one is being forced into contact with anybody. If someone has had a vaccination but is still too concerned to be in public because some people haven't had a vaccine then they're not forced to be there.Surely someone's right not to be infected whilst going about their daily business outweighs someone else's "right" to infect other people.
People who have had the vaccine have taken sensible steps to try to limit the infection why should they be penalised by being forced to come into contact with those who are ignorant and refuse to follow the science?
People are choosing to not have the vaccine. Putting themselves and others at risk.No one is deliberately making themselves a bio-hazard.
So now we are forcing people who have had the vaccine to stay at home just so ignorant Gammon can exercise their right to waltz around the place infecting people?No one is being forced into contact with anybody. If someone has had a vaccination but is still too concerned to be in public because some people haven't had a vaccine then they're not forced to be there.
In your opinion they're putting themselves at risk. In they're opinion they're protecting themselves from the side effects of a vaccine. It's their choice. I wouldn't be comfortable living in a country where those that don't comply with government instructions are segregated from the rest of society. It worries me that so many people seem to be fine with that idea.People are choosing to not have the vaccine. Putting themselves and others at risk.
What "side effects of a vaccine"In your opinion they're putting themselves at risk. In they're opinion they're protecting themselves from the side effects of a vaccine. It's their choice. I wouldn't be comfortable living in a country where those that don't comply with government instructions are segregated from the rest of society. It worries me that so many people seem to be fine with that idea.
No, they're not forced to stay at home either, they can do what they want. It's about freedom of choice.So now we are forcing people who have had the vaccine to stay at home just so ignorant Gammon can exercise their right to waltz around the place infecting people?
At the end of the day if people demand their right to kill off their elderly familiy members, thats up to them. Just don't try and kill mine.
No it's not. Freedom of choice is being curtailed because there are potentially infectious idiots out walking the streets during a global pandemic who refuse to help reduce infections.No, they're not forced to stay at home either, they can do what they want. It's about freedom of choice.
There's a big list of them on our government's website. I don't think David Icke writes that.What "side effects of a vaccine"
Your Debbie on Facebook isn't a qualified medical source just because she's watched a few David Icke dvds you know.
No one has said there is a right to infect. You seem to have lost the plot.No it's not. Freedom of choice is being curtailed because there are potentially infectious idiots out walking the streets during a global pandemic who refuse to help reduce infections.
There is no right to infect.
I'd rather sit next to someone with the freedom to choose what goes into there bodies without fear of being discriminated against for that choice.At the end of the day who would you rather sit next to at Goodison
Someone who has tried their best to avoid being infected and not to be an infection risk to others?
or
Someone who has refused to protect themselves, their family and you?