Crypto currency (IF banned from CA)


This is semantics.

Many exchanges have been robbed. They stole bitcoin.
Exchanges have been robbed same as banks,if you leave your bitcoin on an exchange and the exchange gets hacked thats your own fault,not your keys not your bitcoin!
NOBODY can Rob your bitcoin unless you give them the password!
 
Last edited:
Exchanges have been robbed same as banks,if you leave your bitcoin on an exchange and the exchange gets hacked thats your own fault,not your keys not your bitcoin!
NOBODY can Rob your bitcoin unless you give them the password!
So then your whole point about the Afghani leader robbing millions not happening if it was bitcoin is a load of bollocks.

It's like saying "well the Afghani leader wouldn't have been able to rob that money if everyone kept it stuffed in their mattress rather than in a bank.

feel sorry for these poor people,if they had their money in bitcoin,this would have been avoided.
the central bank governor has legged it with all their money!
not to mention the leader running off with $170 mil of foreign aid.


So how is bitcoin going to avoid this?
 
His whole point was how they wouldn't have gotten robbed by the Afghani leadership if your money was in bitcoin as then you couldn't be robbed by anyone else, yet those links show plenty of people have had their bitcoin robbed so it was a very stupid point.
Look, as you can see from my posts in response to @nikom court I totally disagree with his point in regards to bitcoin and Afghanistan.

But what you clearly fail to understand is the distinction between holding bitcoin on an exchange (middleman) and holding it yourself (self custody of private keys)

It is a massive difference. I disagree with what he says but you can't compare exchanges and other platforms getting hacked, to a bitcoin wallet getting hacked. They are apples and oranges
 
Look, as you can see from my posts in response to @nikom court I totally disagree with his point in regards to bitcoin and Afghanistan.

But what you clearly fail to understand is the distinction between holding bitcoin on an exchange (middleman) and holding it yourself (self custody of private keys)

It is a massive difference. I disagree with what he says but you can't compare exchanges and other platforms getting hacked, to a bitcoin wallet getting hacked. They are apples and oranges
No, I understand that just fine.

What's the difference between holding bitcoin and exchange and holding cash in the bank?

As I said earlier, the Afghanis wouldn't have had their money robbed if they had kept out of the bank and under the mattress.

No difference to that and keep your bitcoins in a private wallet, but banks, just like public exchanges, can be robbed.

Therefore, bitcoin would have offered no advantage over cash.
 

No, I understand that just fine.

What's the difference between holding bitcoin and exchange and holding cash in the bank?

As I said earlier, the Afghanis wouldn't have had their money robbed if they had kept out of the bank and under the mattress.

No difference to that and keep your bitcoins in a private wallet, but banks, just like public exchanges, can be robbed.

Therefore, bitcoin would have offered no advantage over cash.
Exactly.

There is little difference, holding cash in a bank is more secure than holding bitcoin on an exchange. Banks can be robbed, just like exchanges can be hacked

A private wallet where you own the private keys is infinitely more secure than cash under a mattress.

I'm not defending this point that afghanis should have held bitcoin to make them safer, it's a stupid argument. Just read my previous posts.

What I am saying is, you can't conflate exchanges getting hacked with bitcoin being unsecure. It's apples and oranges.
 
Nothing at all like those folks who lost all their bitcoin when the wallet services got "hacked" or the web host "disappeared".

Very secure.






Stop putting your de-centralized assets into a centralized exchange. Stop giving your private keys to exchanges. You give away your keys, you give away your wallet.

The blockchain is very secure. The exchanges......not so much.
 
No, I understand that just fine.

What's the difference between holding bitcoin and exchange and holding cash in the bank?

As I said earlier, the Afghanis wouldn't have had their money robbed if they had kept out of the bank and under the mattress.

No difference to that and keep your bitcoins in a private wallet, but banks, just like public exchanges, can be robbed.

Therefore, bitcoin would have offered no advantage over cash.
Ok,there is no difference between holding bitcoin at an exchange and holding cásh at a bank.
But the big difference when fleeing a country is bitcoin is borderless,it seperates nations from money,is extremely portable and easy to carry over borders and across the globe, nobody can take it from you unless you give it to them, nobody even knows you have it,if there is no advantage in that I give up!
 


Welcome

Join Grand Old Team to get involved in the Everton discussion. Signing up is quick, easy, and completely free.

Shop

Back
Top