I don't remember Roy of The Rovers being as thick as p.s. and blowing his career on any vice he could find whilst treating everyone with contempt. Hmm, maybe I missed that issue.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
- Status
CahillsCornerFlag
Player Valuation: £70m
Praying that he’s still got enough of a name for the Saudis to throw some money at him. Would help us out massively.
granter79
Player Valuation: £35m
Ideal scenario this
Mrbluenose
Player Valuation: £8m
Was Roy of the Rovers also a balloon sniffer?
He's savvy. The terms today guarantee he gets nothing as we won't play him. Giving us a longer "free period" might get him in enough form to become a regular and lead to a payment.
Truthfully though, Dele is done.
Roy wasn't making mega bucks. I recall him going for a goal bonus from a local supermarket. He didn't have enough money for vices.
Kris75
Player Valuation: £2.5m
They do say if you can find something you love it's not work.....
Rudolf Hucker
Player Valuation: £30m
This waster embodies everything I hate about modern football.
If the club had a competent board, they’d have managed him out before now. Cancelled his contract.
If the club had a competent board, they’d have managed him out before now. Cancelled his contract.
CielosGrises
Player Valuation: £15m
When posters say 'cancel his contract' - do they mean 'pay up the remainder of his contract' ?
I assume the club would rather pay him when they have to - rather than up front in a lump - for better cashflow + there is still an outside chance somebody might loan him and get us some of his wages back.
It would be some legal battle to literally cancel a contract without paying the remainder and you'd definitely lose trust from any future signings.
Once they'd signed him, they've basically committed to his wages for the duration - and we are just avoiding the performance fees.
I'd be tempted to make him train with the reserves like they used to - not that he'd be a good influence !
I assume the club would rather pay him when they have to - rather than up front in a lump - for better cashflow + there is still an outside chance somebody might loan him and get us some of his wages back.
It would be some legal battle to literally cancel a contract without paying the remainder and you'd definitely lose trust from any future signings.
Once they'd signed him, they've basically committed to his wages for the duration - and we are just avoiding the performance fees.
I'd be tempted to make him train with the reserves like they used to - not that he'd be a good influence !
I think the club will try and loan him out again to someone, and get them to pay some of his wages (albeit probably a very small percentage).
- Status