Install the app
How to install the app on iOS

Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.

Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

2023/24 Dele

Status
Not open for further replies.
Us losing against Luton at home just reinforce levy's position as we are desperate for more quality so likely that he may need to be involved for more than 5 games...so no need to panic yet for spurs...no chance they will change the terms of the agreement.
 
How can he still be injured?

How many weeks has it been now; ten?

And he is still miles away from getting onto the grass?
I think he is contract and mental health is the "issue".

We can't afford £10m for a few more games.

Plus he has been exposed to some very dark things and he is only going through his personal mental recovery.

I think if we could arrange a cheaper fee with Spurs, he will be in the squad
 

Surely it is in no one’s interest to put obstacles in the way of his recovery and return to football. I cannot understand why Spurs wouldn’t agree to push back the number of games that triggers the next payment. They have agreed a price to let him go, they have taken him off their wage structure so they can’t lose. However given our predicament are we trying to reduce the payments, I can see why Spurs would baulk at that.
 
Objectively, why would Spurs come to the table for renegotiations?
Are we resigning the 'loan' with additional years (at a different salary) and different payment terms? They would not get the payment if we restructure the deliverables within the current contract length...
 

Objectively, why would Spurs come to the table for renegotiations?
Are we resigning the 'loan' with additional years (at a different salary) and different payment terms? They would not get the payment if we restructure the deliverables within the current contract length...
Because if we play him 6 or fewer times this season, they get no fee.

It's not a loan, and the player will become a free agent in June. I presume Everton or any other club would be free to sign him at that point.

I obviously don't know the situation, but given our finances, I'd imagine it's fairly unlikely we intend to play him the number of games that will activate a £10m payment clause.
 
To get a possible something instead of a definite nothing.
But it would mean something if the contract itself is renegotiated, but we don't know anything about his current game (training or match-wise). The only way is to actually consider the payment as a 'loan fee' as a possible something. Could be, hmm....
 
Because if we play him 6 or fewer times this season, they get no fee.

It's not a loan, and the player will become a free agent in June. I presume Everton or any other club would be free to sign him at that point.

I obviously don't know the situation, but given our finances, I'd imagine it's fairly unlikely we intend to play him the number of games that will activate a £10m payment clause.
Yeah but why would Spurs even come in to negotiate, if we add on more games or reduce the first payment fee it would be ditto. Spurs should have something to gain within the current contract length right...
 

Status
Not open for further replies.

Welcome to GrandOldTeam

Get involved. Registration is simple and free.

Back
Top