Seathestars
Player Valuation: £60m
I'm hearing he's not Moshiri's number 1 target, he's Usmanov's number 1 target.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I hope that’s not your address on the dog tag......
Please tell me you haven't got a white van and a Irish accent.
I'm hearing he's not Moshiri's number 1 target, he's Usmanov's number 1 target.
In all honesty mate I dint think even in that scenario we could, the next tier down maybe initially but even city and Chelsea didn't jump right to the very top bracket of manager straight away.
I think there's only a handful of teams in the world who could actually get him, and the likes of arsenal, Liverpool, Dortmund etc I think wouldn't even be able to
It's not that long ago Dave that I saw a post from you asking what has happened to Nil satis nisi optimum ?Does that errand boy think he's being clever linking us to managers of that calibre as a salve for the donkey he'll eventually land us with this international break as a short term manager?
Its terrible psychology if he is doing that.
Moshiri is well out of his depth here. An utter embarrassment to the club.
This isn’t the point I am making at all.No, I'm suggesting that the second they had more money than us (and all of the PL combined) - they became the biggest, most lucrative teams to play for (save from Man United I guess, but that ship has sailed imo).
Giving you a hypothetical question here - you're a player, a star in, say, Spain, playing for Atletico. Two teams come in with serious offers, one of them is Everton, one of them is City. Who do you pick? You're not a fan of either.
One is currently flirting with relegation and has won nothing since 1995.
The other is in the CL, with a chance to win everything they enter, have the best players and manager, have won titles in the last 2-3 years, including the league.
They had Harding bankrolling them before Abramovic did. Chelsea hadn’t won the league since the 1950’s before Abramovic, though.Certainly not Man City
Chelsea is debatable though - before Abramovich took over, they had attracted the likes of Vialli, Zola, Gullit etc
In the 7 years preceeding the Russian takeover, Chelsea finished 4th, 6th, 6th, 5th, 3rd, 4th and 6th - during this period they won The FA Cup twice, The League Cup, The European Cup Winners Cup, The European Super Cup and The Charity Shield
Granted, Abramovich's money took them to another level, but in those 7 years before he took over, Chelsea won as many trophies as we did in the mid 80s.
Man City have been in League One as recently as the 1990’s.City have always been a big club, it isnt accurate to call them a tin pot club! Whether they were bigger than us in pre-history is hardly relevant. The point is we are what we are, where we are. We are acting all hurt and offended at other fans chuckling at the thought that one of the most sought after managers on the planet would come to a club in turmoil, with a gash squad and just above the relegation zone? We wouldnt be doing the same? come on, we are Evertonians, we should have thicker skins than that, what with all the crap we have to put up with!
Interestingly my estate agent contact has just had an enquiry from a Mrs simeone on this property...
Remind me again why our majority owner would not want to get the best manager he can. He thought he was doing so with RK and put his money where his mouth is.