Donald Trump for President Thread

Status
Not open for further replies.
So youre threatening me with a ban because im posting what most men are thinking?

If Trump was a beautiful woman would you believe the theory then...?

Doubtful...

You didnt answer my question...have you ever seen a sober bloke pin down an unattractive woman? This with his wife in the vicinity.

If the answer is no then im not sure how im wrong here.

My post about you in the travel thread about some posters real personality eventually coming out seems true. In the space of a few days you've outed yourself as a sleazy misogynist.

Either that or finally it turns out you are actually younger than all the teenage footballers you keep banging on about, and simply haven't learned any better yet.
 

No idea how these things work.....but I'm assuming these women have now pressed charges against Trump (not just spoke to the media).....so I'm assuming Trump will be arrested or called in for questioning before the election day?...

Also on this Wall Trump wants to build and "make Mexico pay for"...I've yet to hear any reporter ask him (or him answer), How much this wall will cost, How long it will take to build, exactly how high the wall will be and how exactly he intends to make Mexico pay for it......military force?.....

I am not aware of any of them pressing charges against him, indeed most of them seem to be beyond the statute of limitations for sexual assault. There is a rape case going through the courts for which he is a defendant, though it has far less prominence than the groping claims (probably for two reasons - because one of the other defendants - convicted nonce and billionaire Jeffrey Epstein - was much closer to the Clintons than he was to Trump; and because the lawyer co-ordinating it wanted money off the papers for the story).

As for the wall, he hasn't said but one imagines he will just tax remittances.
 
that the lead is only that much after ten days of him being labelled a sex pest on nearly every media outlet should really worry the Clinton camp
It's over. He's behind in basically all the states that are in play on the electoral map. Clinton will get over 330 electoral votes at this rate to Trump well below 200.
 
14702500_1496233293720977_6893983533525096078_n.jpg
 

It's over. He's behind in basically all the states that are in play on the electoral map. Clinton will get over 320 electoral votes at this rate to Trump well below 200.

If nothing changes between now and the election perhaps, but things will probably change between now and then.
 
If nothing changes between now and the election perhaps, but things will probably change between now and then.
He'll fall further behind with the focus on him rather than the issues. It's been a downward spiral since the first debate and momentum seems to be building substantially in that direction.
 
I think, I hope this campaign and election will be a salutary lesson for both the Republican and Democratic parties and in four years time they will put up creditable people before the electorate. Here's hoping.
 
He'll fall further behind with the focus on him rather than the issues. It's been a downward spiral since the first debate and momentum seems to be building substantially in that direction.

Not sure that it will. He prefers it when it is about him rather than the issues - indeed that has been the substantial basis of all the attacks he has faced since the Republican primaries - and the problem is that if events occur which make him seem right (if there is another terrorist atrocity for instance, or if there is a high profile crime involving an illegal immigrant) then that lead will probably be wiped out in a day.

Given the advantages she possesses - intelligence, the overwhelming and active support of almost all the media, vastly more financial resources, better political connections etc - she should be far further ahead than she is.

I think, I hope this campaign and election will be a salutary lesson for both the Republican and Democratic parties and in four years time they will put up creditable people before the electorate. Here's hoping.

I doubt it. A credible candidate over there (or at least one who assessed the problems the US faces and honestly tried to fix them) would probably be assassinated.
 
Those women are on a fame grabbing mission. One is alcoholic and ones relatively has already stated that shes doing it just for the 15minutes of fame.

Operation red herring

Trump is building up a law suit against NY Times as we speak.

Zatara im ignoring you but I give you a little tip. Stop it before youre getting a stamp into your forehead *sexist*

This whole thing is perfect example of how operation red herrings are used and build up.

Just let them believe what they want and ignore what they want...Sadly they dont want to see the unpleasant big picture here.

As @Bruce Wayne said, it has been hard not to believe you are being a WUM but I reckon its very clear you are not.

Get off your high horse thinking that just because a lot of people are disagreeing with you and ridiculing Trump that it means they buy into any media brainwashing or conspiracy.

Most interested parties in this will be well aware of how the media works. In regards to their bias, to the spin they put on all stories and finally the timing of some stories. You seem to think we don't know that the stories about Trump are not conveniently released now because thats how somebody wants it. Its bloody obvious.

It doesn't and shouldn't take away from the mountain of evidence adding up to a picture of a pretty disgusting human being. There is so much that to willully deny it would indicate that you are just as biased and one-eyed as some of the media outlets you are complaining about.

You seem ready and willing to jump on any release about Clinton and seem certain in your views about her actions and inactions. Your comments on this always seem to include comments like witch and other such things...I believe that in real life you'd be changing that w for a b on a regular basis when discussing this topic. Hopefully you can see how people have started to draw their conclusions about sexism and misogyny here.

I think "they",referring to your comment on the other posters, are mostly well aware of the flaws in both candidates so its a dumb comment to suggest your fellow posters on here are ignoring some bigger picture only seen by you. A very dumb comment.

I commented a few days back about how much thought and energy is wasted on this he said/she said nonsense instead of focusing on the overall mess of the polítics systems and quality of governance we experience in our countries. If you want a bigger picture to focus on, focus on that.

Otherwise you are just a raging ape jumping up and down on the same point, and worryingly fixated on one corrupt woman in a world of corrupt politicians.
 

I doubt it. A credible candidate over there (or at least one who assessed the problems the US faces and honestly tried to fix them) would probably be assassinated.

Given that anybody or group that went to the lengths of assassinating a president would be doing so because of risks to their own interests, do you also believe that Trump would be at risk if he got close to winning or won?

I would imagine if he did some of things he said he would, or continued on his bull in a China shop approach, he would be putting himself against some of the same groups, no?
 

Status
Not open for further replies.

Welcome

Join Grand Old Team to get involved in the Everton discussion. Signing up is quick, easy, and completely free.

Shop

Back
Top