Donald Trump for President Thread
- Thread starter longers
- Start date
- Status
Series tied at 2. First team to four wins plays the Indians in the World Series
Ashtonian
Banned on request
here is a question that i think needs to be put out there
Considering both candidates are bad choices. Would Hilary clinton be as supported or widespread unified as the better choice if she was not female?
also to a small extent (because trump clearly isn't a politician so most of it is standard) I think the country and especially actors, and females in general are uniting because she will be a female president, not because they back her views.
Because unless she has a massive change of beliefs, she believes in taking america to war and it would not suprise me if there was a huge military impact in that front once she took charge.
Considering both candidates are bad choices. Would Hilary clinton be as supported or widespread unified as the better choice if she was not female?
also to a small extent (because trump clearly isn't a politician so most of it is standard) I think the country and especially actors, and females in general are uniting because she will be a female president, not because they back her views.
Because unless she has a massive change of beliefs, she believes in taking america to war and it would not suprise me if there was a huge military impact in that front once she took charge.
Wow, sexism at its best here.
Ashtonian
Banned on request
same as obama had more support back then because of his skin colour.
the same as people would vote for trump simply on the basis of him being off the telly.
Works in more than one way
same as obama had more support back then because of his skin colour.
the same as people would vote for trump simply on the basis of him being off the telly.
Works in more than one way
Wow, stop digging a hole Ash.
AndyGray
Collector
dholliday
deconstructed rep
Disappointed to say that the Donald blew it. His performance in the debates was risible, Clinton did well. So most swing voters will either abstain or go Hillary/independent. Even the anti-Hillary Democrats will think twice about voting Trump.
USA won't get the kick up the arse it needs after all. Here's hoping Clinton proves us wrong and actually improves the lives of others: less bombing Arabs, more domestic gun control. Sadly there's little hope of the former, but the latter could go well as Obama makes it his personal mission to make Congress "more Democratic, if not democratic"
USA won't get the kick up the arse it needs after all. Here's hoping Clinton proves us wrong and actually improves the lives of others: less bombing Arabs, more domestic gun control. Sadly there's little hope of the former, but the latter could go well as Obama makes it his personal mission to make Congress "more Democratic, if not democratic"
Swear to God, you are just trying to find ways to be insulting
It's been nice of Finn, Zat, Ash and Butters to neatly categorise themselves for us.
None of that subtlety nonsense, confusing people and making us second guess.
Ashtonian
Banned on request
perhaps you don't agree, but from over the water the predominatly loudest supporters for Clinton has been female. Granted the overall support campaign hasn't, but the most vocal have been female, for a female candidate.
I'm not digging a hole, just pointing out the obvious. Clinton is the best candidate for the job and rightly will be winning the election. I'm not questioning her ability or anything like that, out of the two yes she should be winning and from a political stand point i would want her to win off the back of being the best candidate.
but women have got behind her based on her sex, that is obvious. Just the same as if kanye west does run for president in 2020 as he says he will, he will win by a landslide because he is kanye west.
Ahh but behind the circus is she any better? As debated many times on here, is she actually a better choice? Between a douche and a turd sandwich as aptly put. In fact people fearing trump's war mongering are going to vote in someone who is even more blatent in their views on military action. The threat of war with ISIS or even russia is no less great with clinton in office, the difference between the two is that clinton has a vendetta going into it, trump doesn't
side note, trump clearly trying to throw this now, the pro life judge thing? So bringing in something females would certainly not vote in on the majority? That is a MASSIVE voting pool that he will lose as a result of that, and rightly so
GlosBlue
Player Valuation: £25m
Are you saying Trump would do this? If so I fear you may be in for a shock.
Ashtonian
Banned on request
how is that insulting? Because you are female? Does that mean females aren't getting behind Hilary because of that? Because i can promise you a section of males will be voting trump based on his sex. Same as people voted BREXIT here simply to vote against David cameron.
Because as i see it, What Clinton will do when she wins is break down a huge door that has long been locked which tells every single female in america that equality does exist and not only that, they can be the most powerful person in the country/world if they want to be.
So i know you want to keep writing me off and imply i'm being sexist but i am actually not. Rather the opposite, although clinton may not be a good president in the general sense, she will do something for equality much more than any other female since the early 1900s, which is a good thing
Ashtonian
Banned on request
How am i categorising myself? I have openly admitted if i was american i would vote clinton in as the better choice.
Hardly, she is literally running on being a woman
- Status
Welcome
Join Grand Old Team to get involved in the Everton discussion. Signing up is quick, easy, and completely free.
Shop
