Donald Trump for President Thread

Moomin · October 20, 2016

Ashtonian said:
yeah, all i am saying on the matter is that it is a factor same as it was for barack 8 years ago. Doesn't mean every single person is voting for her because she is female nor does it mean she is going to be elected because of it.

Think you say anything in this thread and it gets labelled as talking about something as if it is the only thing lol but from liverpool, wha ti have seen for a long time is prominant females coming out strongly in support of Hilary. Madonna apparantly was offering sexual acts in return for voting for her (terrible atempt at copying amy schumer who she was introducing at the time) Amy herself being very vocal, Sarah Silverman, Chelsea handler, Ellen de generas, to name just a few. that has been the overall impression of the campaign against trump, and where was the similar singular support for Barack back then? Madonna said nothing then, but suddenly her, and katy perry and all the rest suddenly urging your vote for hilary.

and for the record for anyone who wants to deem me sexist by simply suggesting it, THERE IS NOTHING WRONG WITH A FEMALE PRESIDENT NOR AS A POLITICAN AND SHE IS THE BEST PERSON OUT THE TWO FOR THE JOB.

Maybe all them females are democrats and they are supporters of that party.

dholliday · October 20, 2016

Ashtonian said:
how would i? Genuinely, how would i be upsetting females, simply by mentioning them? I talk about men in the everton forum and no-one seems to get upset about that, simply mentioning females and all of a sudden i am sexist and offensive?

lol

Mooms is fishing for a place in the safe spaces and thus mockingly highlights every micro-aggression :cheers:

AndyGray · October 20, 2016

So happy that USA seem to have a working democracy.

RAFUH · October 20, 2016

Ashtonian said:
It isn't sexist to suggest females will get behind potentially the first female president.

It is more pointing the obvious out. Same as people will vote against her because she is female. Same as people will vote for trump because he is off tv, same as racists and whatnot will support trump because of his comments about it.

Point is they aren't a majority and they aren't the only factor in someone being elected which i have not suggested to be the case. The majority of the people who vote for Clinton will be doing so on her ability as a politican which to be fair in all this, she is a bloody good one, whether you agree with her or not.

It is when you consider it the "obvious" point to make about why someone would vote for a candidate and don't come out with other possibilities until you are called on it.

Ashtonian · October 20, 2016

dholliday said:
Mooms is fishing for a place in the safe spaces and thus mockingly highlights every micro-aggression

haha i know mate.

More so for the fact i know what he wants me to say. I can see it a mile off from his responses so i have chose my words more carefullyas i don't think it to be true i won't say it.

Just putting something out there and getting called sexist as a result simply for mentioning the fairer sex in the context of a female president. What i find amazing to be honest is that the reaction to mentioning females in the general sense like i have done is deemed a lot worse than if i spoke about trumps racism or even mentioned any hypocracies in both the manefestos by both parties.

Just strikes me as 'oh he mentioned females, let's get him and say he is being insulting'. I also mentioned people voted Obama based on skin colour and nobody cared about that.

Ashtonian · October 20, 2016

RAFUH said:
It is when you consider it the "obvious" point to make about why someone would vote for a candidate and don't come out with other possibilities until you are called on it.

It is this again though, i say something and all of a sudden it is implying something else.

I haven't said all females are voting for clinton for that reason, but females will be voting for her based on it. This isn't untrue. Doesn't mean she will win because of it, doesn't mean it is any less of a win, doesn't mean anything along those lines and you seem to just jump straight to that point as if i have typed the words out.

I have not said once clinton will win because of x,y or z. I simply suggested that females have been getting behind clinton more because of it, which is completely true, especially in media where they have been the loudest on it for a long time now.

Are you taking offense because i mention females in context of a female president? Or are you hoping i do say something actually offensive? Because genuinely, same as racists will vote trump, females will get behind clinton based on her sex. Not all of them, but it will be there, same as trumps minorities will vote for him.

SerenityNigh · October 20, 2016

AndyGray said:
A female acquaintance was seated next to him about 20 years ago at a charity dinner. She asked the organiser to be moved to another table after 40m minutes or so, as all he could babble about was how women were ranked and acted according to the size of their breasts.

I'm hoping for a landslide victory to win the HoR and the Senate

We definitely made T&A rankings in high school. And we weren't fit for SGA President. He's a huge embarrassment. Sad.

ItsOKImAPilot · October 20, 2016

This was great. It's like he is in kindergarten.

Moomin · October 20, 2016

Ashtonian said:
haha i know mate.

More so for the fact i know what he wants me to say. I can see it a mile off from his responses so i have chose my words more carefullyas i don't think it to be true i won't say it.

Just putting something out there and getting called sexist as a result simply for mentioning the fairer sex in the context of a female president. What i find amazing to be honest is that the reaction to mentioning females in the general sense like i have done is deemed a lot worse than if i spoke about trumps racism or even mentioned any hypocracies in both the manefestos by both parties.

Just strikes me as 'oh he mentioned females, let's get him and say he is being insulting'. I also mentioned people voted Obama based on skin colour and nobody cared about that.

Ashtonian said:
I think the country and especially actors, and females in general are uniting because she will be a female president, not because they back her views.

Just read back at what you wrote.

SerenityNigh · October 20, 2016

Moomin said:
Wow, I always a fan of his when he was on mock the week.

Done really well for himself. Can you organise his return to these shores and we will send Piers Morgan back in return

No. Send us your tea, jam, and biscuits as well.

Moomin · October 20, 2016

SerenityNigh said:
No. Send us your tea, jam, and biscuits as well.

You lot can't be trusted with tea after the Boston incident.

ItsOKImAPilot · October 20, 2016

Ashtonian said:
It isn't sexist to suggest females will get behind potentially the first female president.

Actually, no. I would prefer it if Clinton were not the one to go down in history as the first female president because she is so hated (rightfully so) and may not do well. I've had to make my decision 100% on policy and facts, not on gender.

But dear oh dear, however am I going to find the time to get out and vote for the fine lady when I'm outside churning butter all day, then vacuuming, dusting and preparing dinner for the man in my life...

ItsOKImAPilot · October 20, 2016

Moomin said:
You lot can't be trusted with tea after the Boston incident.

And we'll do it all again if we have to!

Ashtonian · October 20, 2016

Moomin said:
Just read back at what you wrote.

again, sure, i said that. Not saying at any point ALL females are voting for her because of it, just saying that some females will be. And the fact that female celebrities are the loudest in support is kinda the same thing