You know how FFP works Dave? It’s not just spending y’know, the oldest transfer there is Carroll ( I think) in Jan 2011. So. Let’s go thru EVERY sale (not just the most expensive ones) from jan 2011 and compare them to City.
2011 RS. City
50m Zero
2012 5m. 16m
2013. 6m. 34m
2014. 25m. 12m
2015. 83m. 46m
2016. 65m. 32m
2017. 75m. 4m
2018. 185m. 79m
Total. 494m. 223m
The RS have bought in 494m compared to City’s 223m in transfer sales. 271m more than City, just in transfers. Then, obviously, counter in revenues etc. There’s a reason why only one club is in the headlines regarding FFP. No doubt I’ll get accused of being a RS but the half truths you come out with are ridiculous.
Source. https://www.soccerbase.com/teams/team.sd?team_id=1718&teamTabs=transfers
That’s utter bollocks. You’d swear they were selling their star assets every year and not replacing them.
They get kings ransom for god awful reserve players like solanke, Ibe and that keeper nobody heard of and your acting like the squad is being dismantled and they’re fighting against all the odds.
Net spend was a valid argument for us when we went 2 years without actually signing anyone yet players were still being sold.
But Jesus Christ what a pathetic argument you’ve come up with here. You should be embarrassed of yourself