Install the app
How to install the app on iOS

Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.

Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

  • Participation within this subforum is only available to members who have had 5+ posts approved elsewhere.

ECHO Comment: "Fears of Witch-hunt Against Liverpool FC" part 3

Piijt said:
In another week when they haven’t been out of the news, St Gilloise, a team 99% of them had never heard of, were deemed such a threat they lasered their keeper.
Curiously I haven’t heard any outrage about it in the media…

View attachment 230277
Click to expand...
Absolutely disgraceful.....could've blinded the poor fella. Hope someone puts it on X....or have the Special Dispensation Committee already parachuted into Stanley Park with their criticism-proof smokescreens ?
 


Brigadier2 said:
He's a liar, it wasn't even close to 90 mins on the clock, after the game he said he gave a free kick, he lied he blew the whistle 2 seconds before the ball trickled over the line, he just didn't want liverpool losing a game late on.
Click to expand...
This is exactly the point about the inherent bias I and many others have mentioned in this thread.

I doubt the ref didn't want Liverpool losing a game, it was more likely an almost involuntary panic reaction to avoid it happening in such a strange way when he was ref. If it was west ham v soton the ref wouldn't have panicked in this way.

It's a massive in-built advantage for the usual few and the bar to give a card or decision against them is that much higher because of it (e.g. Man Utd or RS 100% get a VAR penalty for the Calvert-Lewin trip in box late on today).
 
This has all come from the stupid rule VAR has, CLEAR AND OBVIOUS
so instead of says it’s a goal, he gone with I agree with the on field Ref, which gave offside but he thought gave goal

Easy enough without that rule to say yeah it’s a goal

Remove clear and obvious and get the right bloody result. But then it’s been a good line for them to use
 
bluenorthwarrior said:
This is exactly the point about the inherent bias I and many others have mentioned in this thread.

I doubt the ref didn't want Liverpool losing a game, it was more likely an almost involuntary panic reaction to avoid it happening in such a strange way when he was ref. If it was west ham v soton the ref wouldn't have panicked in this way.

It's a massive in-built advantage for the usual few and the bar to give a card or decision against them is that much higher because of it (e.g. Man Utd or RS 100% get a VAR penalty for the Calvert-Lewin trip in box late on today).
Click to expand...
It doesn't help as Mouriniho pointed out, you have have all these ex RS and United pundits on, it just means that decisions against other teams get ignored. TBF I do understand Poll's decison, heat of the moment, he probably knew it was wrong, what I never understood is how nobody at the club accused Clattenburg of out and out corruption. If we didn't have him as a referee for ages, that suggests something was going on. Anyone know if clubs can reject a ref,for past decisions?
 

Welcome

Join Grand Old Team to get involved in the Everton discussion. Signing up is quick, easy, and completely free.

Register
Back
Top