ECHO Comment: "Fears of Witch-hunt Against Liverpool FC"

[ScouseBlueBoy]

Our 'biased interpretation of events' is based on what we see. Yours is based on your love for your team and your hatred of all others, which has been revealed, without a doubt, as 'The Liverpool FC Way'.

Please return to your own forum and destroy the name of our city on your site, not ours.

 

[Antonio Barragan]

Our 'biased interpretation of events' is based on what we see. Yours is based on your love for your team and your hatred of all others, which has been revealed, without a doubt, as 'The Liverpool FC Way'.

Please return to your own forum and destroy the name of our city on your site, not ours.

???? I hate every other football team now?

 

[Chang Elephant]

Also, it's a load of bollocks to say he 'teed him up' with the push. How many times do defenders and attackers push each other to get the advantage in winning the ball?

Antonio, you can type 50 posts a minute, 1000 words per post, make banners, flags, and protest. But Suarez will remain a ****.

 

[Reidy's Bottle Of Grecian]

KENNY DALGLISH reignited the Luis Suarez race row five days ahead of Liverpool’s trip to Old Trafford after the Uruguay international returned in the 0-0 draw with Tottenham.When asked if it was good to have Suarez back from his eight-match ban for making racist comments to Patrice Evra, the Liverpool manager insisted: “He should never been out in the first place.â€￾

fine and ban the pair of 'em.

 

[Kurt.]

Antonio, you can type 50 posts a minute, 1000 words per post, make banners, flags, and protest. But Suarez will remain a ****.

This ^^^^ nail-head-BANG !!

 

[gkpaul]

And what on earth makes that more believable than the simple explanation that he misjudged the ball's landing?

Because he has done this kind of thing at every club he's been at. Great player but a proper dick.

 

[Antonio Barragan]

This ^^^^ nail-head-BANG !!

I thought it was more of a cloak statement because he couldn't reply to my point with anything on topic to be honest.

 

[zed]

Oh come on, there's lots of straws and lots of grasping in here now. The eye-gouging photo HAS to be fake because if that did happen I'm sure Parker would have been in agony, and it would have been replayed in the match. Neither of those things happened. And with the kick, of course you'll think it's intentional because you all hate him but if there was that much in it, it'd be getting looked at by the FA or at least have more media coverage.

its too ott to be true, thats my take on it also. the kick on parker is `only a kick` but lets see how LFC react when the tables are turned - shameless whingeing cry-babies. nothing is beneath LFC - enjoy the beautiful game -ha not at anfield - your club is a sad joke - you are to be pitied

 

[Antonio Barragan]

its too ott to be true, thats my take on it also. the kick on parker is `only a kick` but lets see how LFC react when the tables are turned - shameless whingeing cry-babies. nothing is beneath LFC - enjoy the beautiful game -ha not at anfield - your club is a sad joke - you are to be pitied

That's rich considering you've just described the 161 pages of this thread.

 

[zed]

That's rich considering you've just described the 161 pages of this thread.

duh!.... i`m talking about on the pitch, not faceless, anonymous posters bitching on a forum. so, is that the best you can do?

 

[Librarian]

From Rawk;
I don't think they consciously make a considered decision to do that, because the vast majority of people have reasoning abilities to tell between basic right and wrong, and understand consequences. I include Suarez in this category.

If it was a manc or bitter player which we have so much rivalry against, I might consider the possibility of some hint of malice or intent. But the fact of the matter is that, no matter which way you look at it, there's absolutely no bad blood between us and spurs, much less Parker, to even warrant any malice. Suarez has nothing, absolutely nothing to gain to kick him deliberately, and everything to lose.

So I find it very, very difficult to believe he kick Parker with intent.

 

[Tubey]

That's rich considering you've just described the 161 pages of this thread.

Oh? And I suppose this 512 page effort from your homeland isn't the same but extended?

Bitters indeed!

 

[SweetJesus849]

Nevertheless, regardless of "he was judging the flight of the ball", you couldn't really say that because if he goes "I was judging the flight of the ball, I didn't see him" because he's just been tussling with him like half a second before in the same spot.

It's reckless really.

 

[SweetJesus849]

Oh? And I suppose this 512 page effort from your homeland isn't the same but extended?

Bitters indeed!

Have you seen how long that's been going for as well?

 

[EFCNIK]

From Rawk;
I don't think they consciously make a considered decision to do that, because the vast majority of people have reasoning abilities to tell between basic right and wrong, and understand consequences. I include Suarez in this category.

If it was a manc or bitter player which we have so much rivalry against, I might consider the possibility of some hint of malice or intent. But the fact of the matter is that, no matter which way you look at it, there's absolutely no bad blood between us and spurs, much less Parker, to even warrant any malice. Suarez has nothing, absolutely nothing to gain to kick him deliberately, and everything to lose.

So I find it very, very difficult to believe he kick Parker with intent.

Magical stuff. They just keep giving. I love them in my own twisted little way.