ECHO Comment: "Fears of Witch-hunt Against Liverpool FC"

[ToffeeDan]

I'm not aware of any serious denial of appropriate criticism on this forum. Whereas on RAWK it's a capital offence to criticise - even when it's lazy balls like Mario or Ben Tikky Teke.

 

[Angel Delight]

I'm not aware of any serious denial of appropriate criticism on this forum. Whereas on RAWK it's a capital offence to criticise - even when it's lazy balls like Mario or Ben Tikky Teke.

I disagree. Look at our Mata thread. I don't rate the player and because of this some are having hissyfits!

 

[bluebrotha77]

I disagree. Look at our Mata thread. I don't rate the player and because of this some are having hissyfits!

he is a great player.you know nothing.boooooooooooooooooooo

 

[Angel Delight]

he is a great player.you know nothing.boooooooooooooooooooo

You would fit right in the Mata thread mate!

 

[bluebrotha77]

You would fit right in the Mata thread mate!

Haha trys to stay away from them.everything just gets repeated.an like you said you say he is good you get blasted or you say he is bad you get blasted.fooked if you do and fooked if you dont.

 

[GerryandthePaceMerchants]

he is a great player.you know nothing.boooooooooooooooooooo

You would fit right in the Mata thread mate!

And at the old lady at full time!

 

[ToffeeDan]

I disagree. Look at our Mata thread. I don't rate the player and because of this some are having hissyfits!

I am unsure about Mata - he's had some really good moments and yet Chelsea were willing to sell him to Man U. It's possible that some of that is down to Mourinho but he's not likely to sell to a significant rival (i.e. United) if he did rate him. Still much of that will affect Mata's attitude too.

 

[DownOnTheUpside]

We're in no position to talk at the moment after what happened with Martinez

Before his reign finally became too bad to ignore, anyone with even a shred of criticism for him was annilated and called a "bad supporter" and accused of "disloyalty"

It was honestly cult like at one point

In fact, I think it played a big part in the ferocity that Martinez was met with at the end, which was OTT for a guy who didn't seem like all that bad a bloke

People had been forced to store any criticism up, lest they be assaulted by The Cult, and it eventually all exploded at the end

So yeah, RAWK is bad, but we're no better at times

have you seen that picture someone screencapped after they lost and every single thread is locked

it's actually in their site rules that you are not allowed to criticise Liverpool football cult or any employee thereof

 

[peteblue]

have you seen that picture someone screencapped after they lost and every single thread is locked

it's actually in their site rules that you are not allowed to criticise Liverpool football cult or any employee thereof

Yeah, it undermines their sacred belief that they are always right , all the players are world class, managers such as Brenda are the finest in Europe and they are going to win the league next year........

 

[DownOnTheUpside]

I disagree. Look at our Mata thread. I don't rate the player and because of this some are having hissyfits!

Yes but you havent been banned

Step out of line like that on rawk and say goodbye (and probably thread locked too)

 

[Angel Delight]

Yes but you havent been banned

Step out of line like that on rawk and say goodbye (and probably thread locked too)

Step out of line? I merely said that I didn't rate Mata. I don't. He isn't even our player and some in that thread were quite angry with me.

 

[DownOnTheUpside]

Step out of line? I merely said that I didn't rate Mata. I don't. He isn't even our player and some in that thread were quite angry with me.

It wasnt quite this level was it

See that thread thats a darker red? That's not been locked

 

[roydo]

Step out of line? I merely said that I didn't rate Mata. I don't. He isn't even our player and some in that thread were quite angry with me.

As in, on RAWK, you can only endorse every player who plays for them, every signing they make, and every manager they have. Or leave.

Until, inevitably, said player or manager either leaves, (Exhibit A. Raheem), or gets found out (Exhibit B. Rogers), when then you have to toe the new, revised, RAWK collective view.

On here, such a collective fawning on everything EFC would be bloody weird.

 

[kev]

I disagree. Look at our Mata thread. I don't rate the player and because of this some are having hissyfits!

You really don't get it do you ? I'm pretty sure that nobody gives a tinkers cuss that you don't rate Mata
What does induce "hissyfits" is the fact that you have made numerous repetitive posts saying so.
We get it, you don't think he's good enough. That's OK mate, you are entitled to your opinion.
I doubt that there is anybody on the forum who hasn't got the message that you don't rate him.
so why keep droning on about it ?
People aren't bothered about your opinion on the player. They are bothered by the fact that you are a tedious cockwomble.

 

[Angel Delight]

As in, on RAWK, you can only endorse every player who plays for them, every signing they make, and every manager they have. Or leave.

Until, inevitably, said player or manager either leaves, (Exhibit A. Raheem), or gets found out (Exhibit B. Rogers), when then you have to toe the new, revised, RAWK collective view.

On here, such a collective fawning on everything EFC would be bloody weird.

I agree mate.