Install the app
How to install the app on iOS

Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.

Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

  • Participation within this subforum is only available to members who have had 5+ posts approved elsewhere.

ECHO Comment: "Fears of Witch-hunt Against Liverpool FC"

Status
Not open for further replies.
Mignolet is only starting because Karius is out,who's a far better keeper.

They look pretty good going forward,defensively not so good especially with Moreno at LB who is absolute gash.

Seeing Klopp Dortmund side starting to show with the counter attacking style and plenty of bodies in the box when in the final 3rd which was a Klopp hallmark in his Dortmund sides.

Not sure how they kept Coutinho,i thought he would have been gone,not sure who it was on here but someone said a few weeks they have bad finances and Coutinho would be sold.

You've literally never seen Karius play, have you?

Liverpool have £95m debt. There is also the debt that was converted into equity, despite what some naive kopites believe this does not mean the debt has been 'written off', equity is actually a more expensive source of funding. When City did it was ok as the owners were rich enough to bear the loss, FSG aren't sheikhs though and will want a return for their 'kindness'.

Then FSG have also loaned Liverpool the money for the new stand. Their true debt figure is near £200m. They've kep the wolf from the door by selling a lot of fringe players. But one more year overspending on mediocrity and failing to qualify for the CL and they could be in serious trouble, selling their best players has been their MO for several years now (alonso, mascherano, torres, suarez etc). Despite talk of 600,000 die hards on the waiting list it's still relatively easy to get to any of their matches, it's not even certain they'll fill the new stand.

Winning against Arsenal was ok but it was an Arsenal team without Koscielny, Metersacker, Jenkinson Giroud, Wilshere, Welbeck, Cazorla, and Xhaka and Oxlaide Chamberlain not fully fit - nine players most would have in their first xi who didnt start. And they still scored three times!


It was essentially their reserve team so whilst we blues can see there's not much reason to get excited and some reason to be worried about the future we can only imagine the delusion this has generated over the park, eh?
 
A good win for them at the Emirates to be fair. However as has been said a number of sides have made a habit of that over recent years (including West Ham and Aston Villa). Arsenal tend to start seasons slowly. They had a lad from league 1 and a 21 year old right back starting at centre half, which Liverpool ruthlessly exploited. You can't knock them for that, to be a top 6 team they would need to show they can stick 3-4 goals past those 2 centre backs.

The worrying area for them is their defence. We are led to believe Klavan is close to being first choice. Mignolet was apparently close to being first choice too. Either way moving Bambi on ice into that back four is not going to solve any problems. They conceded 3 to a side missing several key attacking players and were a penalty away from it being 4. That is worrying for them and indicative of problems further down the line if they don't get it sorted.

I expect them to trounce Burnley, but after that they have no more "gimme" games over the next 5-6. Lets look at the league table after 5-6 games and that will give us a more accurate picture of who will finish where.

That was a good Liverpool performance and had Arsenal have had their first choice centre half pairing a game they'd have won 3 or 4 -1. That sends alarm bells to me given how notoriously slowly they start. A gubbing of Burnley won't hide their inadequacies, they are a mid table side who think they are a title challenge. We are a mid table side who have no such delusions of grandeur.

I can very conceivably see Klopp taking Liverpool down, perhaps not this season but in the future. He has all the hallmarks of repeating what he did at Mainz and what he looked likely to do with a far more talented Dortmund team half way through his final season. I couldn't be more relaxed about seeing them, nobody is fearful all I see is a club in terminal decline taking it's last throw of the dice on a chancer and eagerly awaiting the inevitable collapse. I remember them telling me after they won the second place trophy that they would win the league next season. I tried to be reasonable with them and point out it wouldn't happen and Rodgers would be found out. As usual within 12 months all the lads who didn't listen to my foresight were busy calling for Rodgers head.

It is nice to be proven right, but unfortunately unlike most coherent members of humanity who occupy the sane mental space, they are incapable of recalling past events so will busily froth and mansplain how Klopp is now the new saviour (or Fuhrer as some of them took to calling him).

Either way, it was a great win for them at Arsenal. Arsenal had a severe weakness on the day as having to use a division 3 player at centre half but credit to Liverpool for ruthlessly exploiting that. They exploited Arsenals weaknesses to the degree that their own gaping issues were covered over just enough.

If we had won at Arsenal that way of course you'd be delighted, such is the fickleness of football fans. However I would be majorly concerned that we conceded 3 and had to have a penalty saved. I certainly wouldn't be shouting the odds about how brilliant we were and would be well aware of the impending problems on the horizon. Then again I'm not a "loadsamoney" southern tory voter, so that probably excludes me from the core social base of RAWK and indeed the wider support of LFC. They'll probably be whining about that being xenophobic the fruitcakes. Oh the joys.
 
You've literally never seen Karius play, have you?

Liverpool have £95m debt. There is also the debt that was converted into equity, despite what some naive kopites believe this does not mean the debt has been 'written off', equity is actually a more expensive source of funding. When City did it was ok as the owners were rich enough to bear the loss, FSG aren't sheikhs though and will want a return for their 'kindness'.

Then FSG have also loaned Liverpool the money for the new stand. Their true debt figure is near £200m. They've kep the wolf from the door by selling a lot of fringe players. But one more year overspending on mediocrity and failing to qualify for the CL and they could be in serious trouble, selling their best players has been their MO for several years now (alonso, mascherano, torres, suarez etc). Despite talk of 600,000 die hards on the waiting list it's still relatively easy to get to any of their matches, it's not even certain they'll fill the new stand.

Winning against Arsenal was ok but it was an Arsenal team without Koscielny, Metersacker, Jenkinson Giroud, Wilshere, Welbeck, Cazorla, and Xhaka and Oxlaide Chamberlain not fully fit - nine players most would have in their first xi who didnt start. And they still scored three times!


It was essentially their reserve team so whilst we blues can see there's not much reason to get excited and some reason to be worried about the future we can only imagine the delusion this has generated over the park, eh?
Yes i've seen karius play for about 3 years at Mainz,he is quality and the RS got him for a steal at 4.7 million,ranked #2 after Neuer by the end of season Bundesliga players poll.

Debt for clubs is serviceable especially for the clubs in the top 9 turnovers,of the clubs in the top 9 which are in "debt" RS Chelsea United Real Barcelona all those clubs are still spending and their turnovers are consistantly rising year on year,the only clubs in that top 9 who are debt free are Arsenal PSG City and Bayern .When the Glazers bought United they saddled the club with £700 million pound of debt,to their credit they halved that debt and lowered the annual debt payments,but that debt figure has risen back to £700 million from the post fergie spending sprees that have totalled £600 million,their turnovers will hit over £500 million in the next books anyway so no hindrance to them.

Chelsea actually owe Abramovich over 1 billion pounds,but he has changed that debt into equity as you higlighted what FSG have done as well and both those clubs turnovers in 24 months will be over £400 million plus,,and another note of the ALL 5 clubs are expanding stadiums either now or in the forceable future "See the plans for the Nou Camp Bernabeu and Stamford Bridge" and United actually have plans to expand to 90000 so that is further proof these debts for those financial power clubs is no hindrance as servicing a "debt"annually at say 20%-30% of revenues is easily manageable for these financial powerhouse clubs.

Real and Barca have debt together totalling over 1 billion euros and have turnovers each in the £500 million bracket, these clubs with "debt"have massive fanbases,lucrative pre season tours as the international cup pays clubs £20 million each for these tours in the USA and Asia and with massive commercial and matchday revenues these clubs are printing money and easily spend lavishly on player fees/wages and stadium expansion without being handcuffed by "debt".

I always look at skyscraper city website which is fantastic for seeing what sports clubs are doing with stadiums especially NFL teams and football teams there is alot of people in the industry who post on that website like architects,designers,planners etc.From what i read there FSG sold out the corporate boxes within days of going on sale for the new main stand as well as adding season ticket holders from the waiting list and the new stand will be paid off within 3-5 seasons from corporate and the naming rights deal,and also read that the new Annie road end design is being modified to have corporate boxes added because there is demand for them,they have knocked all the houses on the road there so it looks like a new stand there is going up.

FFP is a joke and was supposed to stop clubs being in "debt",but clubs can still have massive "debts",still spend lavishly and easily service the "debt" and interest payments.
 

Yes i've seen karius play for about 3 years at Mainz,he is quality and the RS got him for a steal at 4.7 million,ranked #2 after Neuer by the end of season Bundesliga players poll.

Debt for clubs is serviceable especially for the clubs in the top 9 turnovers,of the clubs in the top 9 which are in "debt" RS Chelsea United Real Barcelona all those clubs are still spending and their turnovers are consistantly rising year on year,the only clubs in that top 9 who are debt free are Arsenal PSG City and Bayern .When the Glazers bought United they saddled the club with £700 million pound of debt,to their credit they halved that debt and lowered the annual debt payments,but that debt figure has risen back to £700 million from the post fergie spending sprees that have totalled £600 million,their turnovers will hit over £500 million in the next books anyway so no hindrance to them.

Chelsea actually owe Abramovich over 1 billion pounds,but he has changed that debt into equity as you higlighted what FSG have done as well and both those clubs turnovers in 24 months will be over £400 million plus,,and another note of the ALL 5 clubs are expanding stadiums either now or in the forceable future "See the plans for the Nou Camp Bernabeu and Stamford Bridge" and United actually have plans to expand to 90000 so that is further proof these debts for those financial power clubs is no hindrance as servicing a "debt"annually at say 20%-30% of revenues is easily manageable for these financial powerhouse clubs.

Real and Barca have debt together totalling over 1 billion euros and have turnovers each in the £500 million bracket, these clubs with "debt"have massive fanbases,lucrative pre season tours as the international cup pays clubs £20 million each for these tours in the USA and Asia and with massive commercial and matchday revenues these clubs are printing money and easily spend lavishly on player fees/wages and stadium expansion without being handcuffed by "debt".

I always look at skyscraper city website which is fantastic for seeing what sports clubs are doing with stadiums especially NFL teams and football teams there is alot of people in the industry who post on that website like architects,designers,planners etc.From what i read there FSG sold out the corporate boxes within days of going on sale for the new main stand as well as adding season ticket holders from the waiting list and the new stand will be paid off within 3-5 seasons from corporate and the naming rights deal,and also read that the new Annie road end design is being modified to have corporate boxes added because there is demand for them,they have knocked all the houses on the road there so it looks like a new stand there is going up.

FFP is a joke and was supposed to stop clubs being in "debt",but clubs can still have massive "debts",still spend lavishly and easily service the "debt" and interest payments.

I'm sure Mainz are a mainstay on American television. And i'm sure you were an avid follower of all their games. Absolutely no scepticism on my part to either of those claims. Actually, I just lied... you just know that he came second in some daft poll don't you? Come on, we're all blues here, no need to pretend.

United's debt has never been £700m and is currently around £250m, so in effect not much greater than Liverpool despite having a far greater turnover.

FSG are bleeding Liverpool dry, Ian Ayre paid himself £1.2m last year lol. But stil, they've got the goalie who was the second best last year so it doesn't matter!

Chelsea, Madrid and Barcelona aren't owned by investors, that's the difference. Abramovich converted debt into equity as an FFP dodge. Which is also what Liverpool did, although it was also a covert way for FSG to bleed more money from Liverpool Plc. Which tends to go over most kopites heads.

Liverpool PLC are in the top 10 for debt. This is a massive cause for concern, the clubs 'ahead' of them can either cope more easily with the debt (united, arsenal) or they don't need to worry about it at all, like real Madrid, City and Chelsea).

I like your optimism re the new stand but there's been plenty of games with empty seats in recent years. They will struggle to sell it out most weeks.

Liverpool PLC made £59m in total from gate receipts last year. The new stadium is being funded with a £49m loan (at least) Even at a minimal interest rate it is difficult to see why you think it'll be paid off in 5 seasons.
FSG will be charging a higher interest rate than the bank (equity is dearer than debt remember), not sure how much they'll get for naming rights but it'll have to be quite a bit if they want to pay it off in 5 years.
In actuality it could take well over a decade, that's if they manage to sell it out.

If I was a kopite reading that I'd be worried. for a bit anyway, until i remembered we've bought a relegated midfielder for £25m and the second best German goalie of all time!!
 

Yes i've seen karius play for about 3 years at Mainz,he is quality and the RS got him for a steal at 4.7 million,ranked #2 after Neuer by the end of season Bundesliga players poll.

Debt for clubs is serviceable especially for the clubs in the top 9 turnovers,of the clubs in the top 9 which are in "debt" RS Chelsea United Real Barcelona all those clubs are still spending and their turnovers are consistantly rising year on year,the only clubs in that top 9 who are debt free are Arsenal PSG City and Bayern .When the Glazers bought United they saddled the club with £700 million pound of debt,to their credit they halved that debt and lowered the annual debt payments,but that debt figure has risen back to £700 million from the post fergie spending sprees that have totalled £600 million,their turnovers will hit over £500 million in the next books anyway so no hindrance to them.

Chelsea actually owe Abramovich over 1 billion pounds,but he has changed that debt into equity as you higlighted what FSG have done as well and both those clubs turnovers in 24 months will be over £400 million plus,,and another note of the ALL 5 clubs are expanding stadiums either now or in the forceable future "See the plans for the Nou Camp Bernabeu and Stamford Bridge" and United actually have plans to expand to 90000 so that is further proof these debts for those financial power clubs is no hindrance as servicing a "debt"annually at say 20%-30% of revenues is easily manageable for these financial powerhouse clubs.

Real and Barca have debt together totalling over 1 billion euros and have turnovers each in the £500 million bracket, these clubs with "debt"have massive fanbases,lucrative pre season tours as the international cup pays clubs £20 million each for these tours in the USA and Asia and with massive commercial and matchday revenues these clubs are printing money and easily spend lavishly on player fees/wages and stadium expansion without being handcuffed by "debt".

I always look at skyscraper city website which is fantastic for seeing what sports clubs are doing with stadiums especially NFL teams and football teams there is alot of people in the industry who post on that website like architects,designers,planners etc.From what i read there FSG sold out the corporate boxes within days of going on sale for the new main stand as well as adding season ticket holders from the waiting list and the new stand will be paid off within 3-5 seasons from corporate and the naming rights deal,and also read that the new Annie road end design is being modified to have corporate boxes added because there is demand for them,they have knocked all the houses on the road there so it looks like a new stand there is going up.

FFP is a joke and was supposed to stop clubs being in "debt",but clubs can still have massive "debts",still spend lavishly and easily service the "debt" and interest payments.

Nice post mate. There is no way that Karuis is the second best goalkeeper in that league. I doubt he'd even be anywhere near the top 5. Lets be honest he is a long way behind the standard of lads like Joe Hart. He is a solid, middle of the rung goalkeeper, with a less impressive CV than Mignolet when he arrived and we saw how that turned out.

As for the rest of the post, it depends really on football continuing to grow and interest rates remaining competitive. Nobody would compare Liverpool to Chelsea. Liverpool have a proud and rich history that pre-dates Chelsea's big takeover. If Abramovic called in the debts I would imagine they would wind up. Liverpool with FSG probably wouldn't be they would be heavily hit. Likewise United, if interest rates rise could find themselves in some difficulty.

Liverpools marketing team have done a very good job over the last 5 years of essentially polishing a turd. You have only been in the Champions league once in what, 7 years and not progressed past the group stages, yet they have negotiated exemplary sponsorship deals. You have to give them credit for that. I wonder how long that can go on though with no prospect of Champions league football to back that up.
 

Status
Not open for further replies.

Welcome

Join Grand Old Team to get involved in the Everton discussion. Signing up is quick, easy, and completely free.

Back
Top