Had a little look on RAWK. They are all convinced that Klopp is the more successful manager. They even claim anyone "sane" can see this, which works if your definition of insanity is an inability to count to 8.
They provide no evidence for this assertion other than their own opinions and some comments from Koeman praising Klopp as categorical evidence that he "knows Klopp is a superior manager".
There's then a lot of stuff about Klopp going to Bayern, which I can't ever remember saying so Christ knows why that little strawman has been built.
Anyway the end result it seriously rankles with them that Koeman has been more successful than Klopp in his football career including his playing career. I am not celebrating this and in all honesty couldn't care less. What I care about is factual accuracy and correcting those who wish to lie or ignore evidence.
Anyway for any of the rats who are lurking, can you produce 1 piece of tangible evidence that Klopp has been more successful than Koeman as a manager? Koeman has even managed to finish in the top 7 twice in England which Klopp failed to do in his first 3/4 season here! I have nothing against Klopp, he's a good coach and seems a decent bloke but his trophy cabinet looks bare compared to Koemans, as either a player, manager or both.
Klopp has only managed in England for one season, not three or four in case you were not sure.