longers
Parcheggia l'autobus
According to Hamas.
The UN as of yesterday say it's around 25,000
With the spread of identifiable deaths at 40% men, 32% children and 20% women
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
According to Hamas.
According to every reputable NGO and human rights organisation on the planet.According to Hamas.
The UN as of yesterday say it's around 25,000
With the spread of identifiable deaths at 40% men, 32% children and 20% women
According to every reputable NGO and human rights organisation on the planet.
You’re as bad as a holocaust denier with that comment.
If Hamas didn't hide out in schools/hospitals/mosques how many could be avoided? Again - this is proven by NATO as a used tactic by Hamas (you know, Hamas - the Terrorist Organisation, supported by and voted into power by Palestinians)
I find this such a mad stance to have. If they are all hiding out in hospital and mosques then tough [Poor language removed], doesn't mean you can just level the buildings and kill a ton of civilians. Even America weighs up collateral damage when attacking targets. Israel gives zero fecks whatsoever and dropped more bombs on Palestine in the first 2 weeks of the war than America and the coalition did in the entirety of the Iraq and Afghan wars.
Honestly shocked there are still non zionists trying to justify what they are doing. Even the US government is trying (miserably) to distance themselves from Israels actions.
That's the thing, you can. If a target is deemed to be in the vicinity then they're accepted losses. Don't blame me, blame the Geneva Convention.
If the human shields are there against their will - then the death is down to the terrorist using them, if they're not there against their will, then they are co-conspiritors. Therefore, the blame doesn't fall on Israel.
Yeah, but what about the Latvian number? Giving it a chance to place top ten?
That Dutch troublemaker got kicked out. Proper order there imo.
That's the thing, you can. If a target is deemed to be in the vicinity then they're accepted losses. Don't blame me, blame the Geneva Convention.
If the human shields are there against their will - then the death is down to the terrorist using them, if they're not there against their will, then they are co-conspiritors. Therefore, the blame doesn't fall on Israel.
The UN chief, Antonio Guterres, has termed Israeli's retaliation as a clear breach of International Humanitarian Law (IHL), which is underscored by the fact that attacking civilian targets and using prohibited weapons like white phosphorus is in blatant breach of core provisions under the Geneva and Hague Conventions.
Also from today
![]()
US says Israel may have breached international law with American weapons in Gaza
Report says it is "reasonable to assess" there have been breaches in Gaza, but admits it does not have "complete information".www.bbc.co.uk
That's the weapons they're using - not the tactics they're following mate.
'International law doesn’t directly address human shields, but it does have two existing precedents that apply to it.
Firstly, it is a crime to intentionally place military facilities in civilian areas where it is certain that civilians will be killed.'
Why should Israel fight fair if Hamas/Palestinians refuse to?