So your not allowed to try and block players now apparently. Very debatable whether the lad was offside to begin with. Crap decision, should let it stand.
It's not though is it because if you give it for obstruction that is nowhere near the ball then you'll need to be chalking off several goals a game and giving fouls film every single corner. A complete and utter BS decision.Obstruction all day long-unfortunately
130k a week...Doucoure playing like a U9 schoolboy player who forgot his shin pads & tie his shoes before the game kick off
It's all in the script...I’ve seen it all now. Tarkowski was surrounded by literally 3 defenders when he won that header; yet the other lad would have stopped him.
They're on strike over the sale of the Observer.Guardian 'live' match text updates about every 20 minutes, pile of crap.
So you're saying the guy blocked off stood more chance than the 3 guys challenging tarkowski?If you don’t think that should have been disallowed you are totally wearing blue specs![]()
But he wasn't the defender following Tarkowski. So he wouldn't have been the one challenging him. The one following the run got massively out jumped.He’s miles away because the guy has blocked him?