Got to stop the bleeding, if he plays on an it bleeds onto his shirt he has to go off to swap shirtsWell on top there.
Tarkowski get up lad - taking the sting out of it.
Got to stop the bleeding, if he plays on an it bleeds onto his shirt he has to go off to swap shirtsWell on top there.
Tarkowski get up lad - taking the sting out of it.
Time to play Broja and Chermitti!A poacher would have feasted on that Young ball, DCL doesn't even have a clue what a poacher is.
You forgot the bit where we concede...We'll labour on for the rest of this game now and fail to score again.
No way can this be disallowed
He was standing right next to him? I know everyone wants to think we get robbed at every point in any given time and all but really think this one is easy to understandB
But he wasn't the defender following Tarkowski. So he wouldn't have been the one challenging him. The one following the run got massively out jumped.
No, but they can at least humour us and make it look like they're making an effort when it comes to big decisions like that.You’re arguing Mangala was actually onside?
Well none of those defenders ran into a player standing offside right?Miles away because he's nowhere near to effect the ball. Compared to the 3 defenders around Tarko
Exactly what I was thinking, would be if it was one of ours.No var for the elbow?
Seriously?They're on strike over the sale of the Observer.