The structure was identical to Leeds (from memory) and the only purpose behind it was allegedly consolidation of the overdraft of c 16m and player purchases I think.Oh wow...did we really?
The problem being that we had an overdraft again within a couple of years, and not much was spent on playing staff.
So short term stuff done with long term debt.
Similar to Leeds, but we didn't squander as much on awful players that got relegated.
In fairness I think our debt was manageable as long as we remained in Premier League.
As an aside, the 5 new charges at Companies House would lead me to the conclusion that ICBC are funding part (if not all) of the required stadium borrowings on top of the credit facility - that accounts for 3 of the 5.
The other 2 are intercreditor shennanigans between Barclays and ICBC, which would lead me believe that there is either a new overdraft facility with Barclays, or Barclays may be involved in the funding too.