How are Nottingham Forest allowed to spend so much this season, as I remember it they were found to be more in excess of PSR regs than us.
…I assume we’re now in a new accounting period.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
How are Nottingham Forest allowed to spend so much this season, as I remember it they were found to be more in excess of PSR regs than us.
Presume it’s the Brennan Johnson profit kicking in
I was baffled by their spending as well but they've sold a lot of players too remember they've basically been the aldi's Chelsea so they have ample players to sellHow are Nottingham Forest allowed to spend so much this season, as I remember it they were found to be more in excess of PSR regs than us.
Theirs was 100% profit. Ours wasn’tThen we sold Onana for roughly the same sum.
Our mate Textor lashed them 60m for 2 rubbish players.How are Nottingham Forest allowed to spend so much this season, as I remember it they were found to be more in excess of PSR regs than us.
Income | 23 | €89.30m |
Expenditure | 19 | €96.50m |
Overall balance | €-7.20m |
Theirs was 100% profit. Ours wasn’t
Then we sold Onana for roughly the same sum.
These are just quotes from Thursdays presser. He also said they’d be sitting down monitoring any possibilities right up to the deadline and there would be no point doing that if there was no money/possibility.What's Dyche on about?
View attachment 271224
Sauce:
Transfer Centre LIVE! Football transfers, news, updates and rumours
Follow the latest news, gossip, rumours and reaction with the Sky Sports Transfer Centre...www.skysports.com
Our mate Textor lashed them 60m for 2 rubbish players.
Income 23 €89.30m Expenditure 19 €96.50m Overall balance €-7.20m
Nottingham Forest - Transfers 24/25
Transfers: Overview of all signed and sold players of club Nottm Forest for the current season.www.transfermarkt.co.uk
For PSR a loss doesnt matter.So their opperating on a loss after two more years of operating at a loss?
And their lookkng to spend more today
In our position, succession planning is absolutely vital.I'm not arguing that CB didn't need attention. Just that it didn't require immediate attention. It only required attention if certain things happened, as you quite rightly said, Branthwaite leaving would've required a new CB. Tarkowski being out injured for a while would've required a new CB.
Succession planning is something we can't really afford to do, in my opinion. With very little to spend, it's a luxury. If we don't become more threatening in attack and score more goals this season, I believe we will go down. I don't think it's wild to suggest we have the worst attack in the division (again). If that isn't addressed in these remaining hours of the window, ,maybe we won't go down but we'll almost certainly be down the bottom fighting with the rest of them.
Given that O'Brien doesn't start ahead of either Branthwaite or Tarkowski when fit, I expect the O'Brien signing isn't going to be what has kept us up, if that plays out. Priorities all wrong, again, even if O'Brien might prove to be an astute signing down the line. It won't matter if we're not in the Premier League, will it?
Joyce saying Chelsea wanted to pay about £12m for Dom
Think that's all she wrote for today then