Correct, they are not as good, but none of them are good defenders.This is a mind-boggling conclusion.
Godfrey and Holgate have their issues, absolutely. But one thing they both have in their favour is they're not Michael Keane.
Correct, they are not as good, but none of them are good defenders.This is a mind-boggling conclusion.
Godfrey and Holgate have their issues, absolutely. But one thing they both have in their favour is they're not Michael Keane.
People love to hate on Keane. Like an excessive amount.This is a mind-boggling conclusion.
Godfrey and Holgate have their issues, absolutely. But one thing they both have in their favour is they're not Michael Keane.
Basically a wash for selling Richarlison and net profit once Kean is sold. Embrace it. Soak it up and enjoy spunking our junk on some good players for a change.We will have spent over 60 mil if we sign gana and Onana with Dwight and more to come it seems
Talk is 30m which is terrifyingI wouldn’t be against Coady on loan, it would be like having a slightly younger David weir and Richard Gough having Coady and Tarks as out back 2 ?
People love to hate on Keane. Like an excessive amount.
I guess if he put in some thundering challenges like Godfrey that would get him off the never having a good game ever.
If we get Onana, Am thinking that’s majority of our budget so Lampard has probably been promised a Chelsea loan, either Batshuayi or Broja
If, and it is a big if, Onana goes through, I actually think that Everton will roll the dice a bit (not for huge amounts) with another promise that if we can't recoup the money by the end of the year through improved commercial performance, sales of unwanted players and prize money, then we will sell another asset.Yes I also have this theory. They must have something lined up
Keane turns 30 in January 2023. His contract runs until June 2025, so his book value is fairly low at just under £9.4m (£25m divided by 8 years = £3.125m per year). He's widely reported to be on more than £70k p/w.Correct, they are not as good, but none of them are good defenders.
We wont sell Keane for 10m.Keane turns 30 in January 2023. His contract runs until June 2025, so his book value is fairly low at just under £9.4m (£25m divided by 8 years = £3.125m per year). He's widely reported to be on more than £70k p/w.
Keane cannot play in a 3 CB system and would not, with everyone fit, be a starter in a 2 CB system. He cannot play elsewhere. He cannot lead/organise the defence. He ONLY looks any good in a back four playing a low block, with a big character alongside him to lead, organise and keep him from crumbling mentally.
If another CB on relatively big money comes in then Keane AND Mina will have to leave within six months otherwise our wages to income ratio will get hammered again, causing us more P&S issues.
I would take £10m for Keane right now. Absolutely no question. It would be a small profit against book value but it would take a hefty wage off the payroll and get a very limited player out of the squad.
If we wanted to make a similar small profit on Godfrey this summer we'd have to sell him at around £15m due to his current book value.
Holgate? Book value is super low because his original transfer fee was modest. Any sale now would be almost pure profit. There is a financial argument for selling him, yes. But he's on lower wages than Keane, is younger and faster, can play in 2 CB and 3 CB systems and can also fill in as a RB in a flat 4. He makes errors, but certainly no more than Keane.
Even if Keane was the better player (and he isn't), the numbers are pretty clear. An offer of £10m would be enough to let him go.
He's not really a proven scorer at all, getting 11 goals while starting basically every match and taking penalties is pretty poor.Get Pukki on loan I reckon. Proven PL scorer, low wages.
There's a lot here that is just making massive assumptions about James Tarkowski.Keane turns 30 in January 2023. His contract runs until June 2025, so his book value is fairly low at just under £9.4m (£25m divided by 8 years = £3.125m per year). He's widely reported to be on more than £70k p/w.
Keane cannot play in a 3 CB system and would not, with everyone fit, be a starter in a 2 CB system. He cannot play elsewhere. He cannot lead/organise the defence. He ONLY looks any good in a back four playing a low block, with a big character alongside him to lead, organise and keep him from crumbling mentally.
If another CB on relatively big money comes in then Keane AND Mina will have to leave within six months otherwise our wages to income ratio will get hammered again, causing us more P&S issues.
I would take £10m for Keane right now. Absolutely no question. It would be a small profit against book value but it would take a hefty wage off the payroll and get a very limited player out of the squad.
If we wanted to make a similar small profit on Godfrey this summer we'd have to sell him at around £15m due to his current book value.
Holgate? Book value is super low because his original transfer fee was modest. Any sale now would be almost pure profit. There is a financial argument for selling him, yes. But he's on lower wages than Keane, is younger and faster, can play in 2 CB and 3 CB systems and can also fill in as a RB in a flat 4. He makes errors, but certainly no more than Keane.
Even if Keane was the better player (and he isn't), the numbers are pretty clear. An offer of £10m would be enough to let him go.
Wouldn't be a bad haul really. Short on goals but much stronger elsewhere. Hopefully it takes the pressure off Richy and he can...Onaha and Gana and thats our lot I reckon.
Loans for the rest.