Everton Summer Transfer Thread - 2022

[Goat]

We literally do. You had the same fear mongering sources that make up everything, but for some weird reason some of you continue to believe even when proven false 1000 times. Find me one source confirming it happened before July, because there are hundreds, including all of the reliable ones saying it didnt.

Fri 01 July 2022, 09:00

Thats the time and date Spurs announced the deal, are you suggesting its out of the realms of possibility that the deal was signed and agreed 10 hours before that?

You know yourself that deals arent announced on the very second that they are signed sealed.

But here is Fab saying that the deal was signed and sealed on 30th June.

 

[MrGrumpy]

Looks like it might be a busy week this week

 

[ForeverBlue92]

Looks like it might be a busy week this week

Proper excited me yano mate.

I think it'll be a busy deadline day for us as well.

 

[billyblue80]

Bererton Diaz available for ten million apparently?

 

[MrGrumpy]

Proper excited me yano mate.

I think it'll be a busy deadline day for us as well.

Looks like Gana Onana and Cody all in the next day or 2 and a few other links.. just need rid of a few now

 

[Clarky cat]

Have we been linked with any strikers? Reckon we can get one in before the Villa game?

Yes. The entire French union of administrative workers who will not file paperwork on a weekend.

 

[PeregrineT]

Fri 01 July 2022, 09:00

Thats the time and date Spurs announced the deal, are you suggesting its out of the realms of possibility that the deal was signed and agreed 10 hours before that?

You know yourself that deals arent announced on the very second that they are signed sealed.

But here is Fab saying that the deal was signed and sealed on 30th June.

So, thats all you have? The italian journalist who thinks contracts(not the same as registering it with the league fyi) were signed late the night before?

And lets not go into the absolute absurd notion that the league, who had been monitoring and giving the okay on their activity to make sure they were complying, for some reason decided to do a "Yeah you are actually way short, we are going to allow it, on the idea that maybe you get enough for Richarlison in 6 months time".

Or ignoring that sky said "Tottenham offered £40m in writing at 4pm on Wednesday(the 29th) and Everton chairman Bill Kenwright initially went away, believing the offer was insufficient." First offer Wednesday late in the day that Everton ignored....because they were in desperate straights to comply with FFP huh?

 

[Goat]

So, thats all you have? The italian journalist who thinks contracts(not the same as registering it with the league fyi) were signed late the night before?

And lets not go into the absolute absurd notion that the league, who had been monitoring and giving the okay on their activity to make sure they were complying, for some reason decided to do a "Yeah you are actually way short, we are going to allow it, on the idea that may be you get enough for Richarlison in 6 months time".

Or ignoring that sky said "Tottenham offered £40m in writing at 4pm on Wednesday(the 29th) and Everton chairman Bill Kenwright initially went away, believing the offer was insufficient." First offer Wednesday late in the day that Everton ignored....because they were in desperate straights to comply with FFP huh?

Oh mate, you're using Sky as a source.

Look, I didnt believe the stories regarding us having to sell before 1st July.

But we then sold him before 1st July, thats all really.

No point in back and forth, we both have our view and neither will be moving from that, so lets leave it here.

 

[bluestevon]

I can see a mad dash at the end of the window. Still see us using those domestic loans too.

I think he will come here over West Ham too

I do too, fair play if he stays and trusts in his ability to break their starting team, still think he's being niave if he does though as he won't really play much at all. The 60 seconds yesterday was honestly a slap down to him I felt.

 

[MrGrumpy]

I do too, fair play if he stays and trusts in his ability to break their starting team, still think he's being niave if he does though as he won't really play much at all. The 60 seconds yesterday was honestly a slap down to him I felt.

Felt more like taking the piss out of us.. infact with Borja(spelling) as well

 

[PeregrineT]

Oh mate, you're using Sky as a source.

Look, I didnt believe the stories regarding us having to sell before 1st July.

But we then sold him before 1st July, thats all really.

No point in back and forth, we both have our view and neither will be moving from that, so lets leave it here.

Oh no, dont try that BS. I used Sky as one of my thousands of sources to your one because they had a very specific quote as to what was going on. If you want to believe absurd theories and then pretend to be disinterested thats fine, but then be surprised if you end up down the Davek road a few years down.

"Mate we dont know when the Richarlison deal went through.
...But we then sold him before 1st July,"

Apparently we know but we dont.

 

[billyblue80]

I do too, fair play if he stays and trusts in his ability to break their starting team, still think he's being niave if he does though as he won't really play much at all. The 60 seconds yesterday was honestly a slap down to him I felt.

Especially if they buy Auba and another forward which looks likely

 

[Bkk Andy]

We didnt though. We sold Richy July 1st. Last years accounts ended June 30th. Just because somebody posted on twitter from their grandamas basement doesnt mean for some reason actual rules and basic accounting go out the window.

Theres less than 0 reason to believe the crazy notion that we sold Richy to meet some kind of made up pretend financial guideline. Richy was sold because he was going, and we are using the funds from that as well as what we can NOW spend beyond that, since 19/20 is now off the 3 year roll.

But the question remains; are you in your grandma's basement?

 

[bluestevon]

Especially if they buy Auba and another forward which looks likely

Was talking about Gallacher mainly mate, but same boat for him especially if they buy De Jong - he simply will be used 38 times as a 30 second time wasting sub

 

[Goat]

Oh no, dont try that BS. I used Sky as one of my thousands of sources to your one because they had a very specific quote as to what was going on. If you want to believe absurd theories and then pretend to be disinterested thats fine, but then be surprised if you end up down the Davek road a few years down.

"Mate we dont know when the Richarlison deal went through.
...But we then sold him before 1st July,"

Apparently we know but we dont.

Its not disinterest, im trying to save the forum from page upon page of us going back and forth arguing our point with no conclusion.

As I say, I have my view, which I wont be changing, you have your view, which you wont be changing.

As said, I dismissed all the stories of us having to sell before 1st July as complete poppycock, IMO, we then closed the deal on the 30th June, which leads me to believe they had some merit.

Do you not think its strange that numerous stories all said we had to sell him before 1st July, then on the 1st July hes officially sold? Does that not seem odd to you?