teppic
Player Valuation: £50m
Or even £40M to Chelsea. This is an absolute godsend. Another winger and Striker with this money.Gordon to Newcastle for £35M if that offer is still there, then buy a striker and winger.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Or even £40M to Chelsea. This is an absolute godsend. Another winger and Striker with this money.Gordon to Newcastle for £35M if that offer is still there, then buy a striker and winger.
It was made up though mate, hopefully this isn't as it's huge money for someone with 1 top-flight season and not a lot of attacking output. IF Chelsea have bid £40m, I think we could get a bit more with Boehly trying to go big this summerWell, if the £35M offer was made up, time to accept the £40m.
I think too often he gets the ball and wants to impress, rather than just do something simple that'll help the team out.I’d absolutely snap their hand off for £50m. We all get carried away with the thought of his potential and how much more he could be worth to this team but I honestly think he’s at or near his ceiling already.
Virtually guarantee he’d be off on a freebie to the Champo at the end of his contract (after multiple underwhelming loans) if we sacked off this opportunity.
I'd agree with you if he was Rooney-esque, but he's not (and even Rooney was sold!).That logic just comes from confirmation bias mate, there is a liteany of cheaper homegrown 18/19 years old you can be signing for less then half of 100 mill - that premise is just illogical, not to mention Chelsea have almost two -3 full teams of full homegrown players out on loan - of all the teams in the world that could apply to Chelsea are the last. Why not go for like Nathan Broadhead for example.
So if we’re going of stats given Brojas, you would be against signing him. It’s like I said if we were signing someones of Gordon profile we would be saying “huge potential” because we produced him for some reason “no end product”. Look I’m going to be honest, I don’t know how anyone can watch him and not think he’s is going to be absolute quality - I honestly can’t, just can’t my head around it, it’s not even subtle, he tick so many boxes and he’s only beginning.
But look everyone has opinions,but we won’t agree on Gordon.
My take is, if we sell Gordon we may as well just pack up, because your building nothing and going no where - I don’t think we will because it would be turbo thick and while I think we are prone to stupidity, I don’t think we’ve hit turbo thick levels (yet).
Don't forget Pickford.Cool mate so Tarkowski and Mykolenko same type of player then
Yeah, we absolutely have to have players lined up. They have been working hard on that and the Gordon interest won't be completely out of the blue, so I imagine there is a set of options with the budget we have (Guirassy or whoever) and in the course of looking around they have found a set of options we could get with the budget we have plus 40-50 mil extra.If Gordon is to go, there has to be deals in place for players coming in. We cant be doing another Richarlison where we let him go and 5 weeks later there is still no replacement.
Get deals agreed then sell if we are going to sell.
Chelsea meet our valuation and we can bring in better than were looking at.Can't see anything in these rumours. Why would they?
There’s a player in there alright. Frank and the coaches know that, I suppose as fans we’re just impatient but I think he’s going to kick on this year. Albeit he’s been poor the first 2 games.Hard no on Gordon, there is a reason half of football want him.