CBA to see if anyone else has pulled you up on this, but you HAVE to be joking.
Lingard's spell at WHU proved that he is a lazy waster. He could have played like that for the bulk of his career at ManU but he didn't. Why? Because he had a fat, comfortable contract and zero self-motivation or professionalism. He only made an effort at West Ham because:
a) He was aware that ManU won't be renewing his contract
b) It was a loan move
c) He wanted to try to get into the England squad
He was CLEARLY trying to attract a new employer. If a club was stupid enough to buy Lingard now, they'd get the same lazy turd who faded into obscurity at ManU. That's what he does when he gets a long-term contract.
Would I take him on loan until January? Yes. But I don't want an obligation to buy, I don't want a loan fee and I don't want to pay more than £30k per week for him. Let ManU continue to pay for their recruitment error.