You are one of the most monumental cryarses on this forum.
Even if you didn’t know what “the plan” was, at some point over the 2,700+ pages on this thread you couldn’t help but have tripped over it at some point.
PL profit and sustainability rules are based on the last 3 years’ accounts. Ours are an absolute horror show. We’ve signed cheap/older players on short-term deals so that, when those contracts are up we’ll have created enough financial wiggle room for ourselves to sign younger/better/longer term solutions.
Not a single person thinks this window has been objectively good, but if you want to continually ignore the enormous restrictions on what we can do then your opinion is completely and utterly invalid, and you’re simply whining for the sake of it.
If a player costs more than a multipack of Twix, we can’t sign them.
If we can’t generate significant income from the turgid players that nobody wants, we can’t increase our available budget.
If clubs don’t want to loan/sell us players, or the players want more wages than we’ve offered we have little or no leverage in negotiations.
What we COULD have done better was address the RB problem years ago, but we didn’t. We could have tried to exploit the burgeoning “loan with an option/obligation” market this window for incomings but we didn’t.