Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
3 reasons. Only one I can post in here though. Which tbf, only excludes Dortmund, possibly. And that is that he wants to play in England. Which he has said before. The player that is.
Any idea on whose bid what and what the magic number is?
Kiev bloke has been in touch.
100% bids from us, Arsenal, and Dortmund. Possible 2nd bid from us to get move this window. But very unlikely he will move this window, unless Barca/RM pipe up.
There is a price that all 3 clubs know, and when met, permission granted to talk to player. Rest will be up to player.
I genuinely don't see what we desperately need?
I'd like a poacher, absolutely, someone like 5month-Jelavic.
But if it's spending something now and less in the summer when there is more value for money then I think we have everything we need.
Nope. The club(s) do though.
Keeper even if someone to develop for 6months
Centre mid as without Besic/McCarthy we have no power there and also no one with any guile.
Left winger as we are very light there
then of course striker and right back
We can't have a back up to a back up at Everton mate. We've got 2 able players in Mac and Besic. It's unrealistic to want more.Keeper even if someone to develop for 6months
Centre mid as without Besic/McCarthy we have no power there and also no one with any guile.
Left winger as we are very light there
then of course striker and right back
Quoted by Kiev or in his contract?
Does your guy think it would be reached this window? If not then would it be lower in summer?
Not quoted by my man, he just passed on what the Kiev press were saying. Re this window, Dortmund have walked until the summer, his source denies a move to Arsenal this window will happen.
Hooray for proper transfer speculation! Just enough of the element of truth for those who want to believe to suspend doubt
Cheers Roydo.
Can't see Yarmz going anywhere in this window myself like.
Not speculation mate. I have said ad nauseum that this is not "Off". It has never been off any agenda either.
That does not mean it is "On" either. But I cannot expand on that without compromising my source.
Hi Neil xthanks for keeping us half in the loop roy