Match Thread Everton v Swansea. 24th Jan at 1330.

[davek]

Need the experience for that game.

Especially with Aguero back on form.

Aguero v Jagielka.

Are you sure?

 

[sageyefc]

Unfortunately that team news looks it'll be Jagielka in for Wednesday.

Bad move. Funes Mori and Stones did the business against City first leg and shouldn't be broken up.

Should be jags and mori against city. Joel starting is the main thing though

 

[davek]

Jagielka did the business in the league. Also at one time this season you did mention that Martinez was right to stick with Howard because of seniority so what's the difference with Jagielka? Also I thought you said you wanted Stones' dropped when Jagielka returned? What's changed buddy?

Did I? Where did I say that?

 

[royvernon39]

Jags did not do the biz at Chelski.

Mori did.

 

[Eggs]

......Williams usually dies for the cause and they are tough to break down but I would hope that we are simply better than Swansea.

 

[bluestevon]

If Jags is dropped for precaution you'd think Galloway would have been on the bench instead. Worrying indeed. Barry as our backup centre back.

aye just our luck you know we will have to sub one of the centre backs now as well

 

[davek]

Should be jags and mori against city. Joel starting is the main thing though

If Jagielka is up to speed then ok. The Jagielka running through treacle against Chelsea will be torn apart.

 

[ianefc]

Did I? Where did I say that?

Martinez said that, you agreed with his stance.

 

[ToffeeTim]

4-3-3 today by the looks. Quite happy with the side to be honest.

But so much for the howard rumours. What a fool I am for getting excited lol

 

[TheAlmightyFloater]

......Williams usually dies for the cause and they are tough to break down but I would hope that we are simply better than Swansea.

Ki and Siggurdsson are easily capable of either scoring/creating though.

 

[TomDixie]

Gareth Barry with 106 Prem League bookings! lol

 

[chicoazul]

It's an internet forum mate. That's basically the dictionary definition of what you do on one.

Zully, are you in the wind up?

Absolutely not. This forum isn't personal therapy for anxiety ridden self loathing haters, it's for everyone so these tits (you know who you are) should be more respectful to others wanting reasoned and rational views.

 

[davek]

Martinez said that, you agreed with his stance.

Did I? Where is this written?

 

[ianefc]

Absolutely not. This forum isn't personal therapy for anxiety ridden self loathing haters, it's for everyone so these tits (you know who you are) should be more respectful to others wanting reasoned and rational views.

Does that mean I am or am not a tit?

 

[Jib in lad]

We will hammer these today.