really need to see a decent highlight of the pen, watching a stream on an IPad and I’m still yet to clearly see that Loris touched it.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
But Richarlison DIDN'T leave his foot in, he shoulder barged Romero and Romero tried to make out that he'd kicked him. Have another look.Nothing wrong with Holgates challenge for me. It's just one of those things. Richarlison did worse earlier in the game when he left his foot in on Romero (probably was him).
Either way the lack of consistency is shocking. Either they are all fouls or none of them are. The level of punishment deals with the severity of the challenge.
I thought it was a great game. Everton showed plenty of fight. Could have gone either way. Pen decision terribleDid not watch. Average result
really need to see a decent highlight of the pen, watching a stream on an IPad and I’m still yet to clearly see that Loris touched it.
That Davies did that 3 times on the trot in the second half, not even a card.Thought the ref was poor in general, forget the big VAR decisions felt he absolutely favoured spurs, lost count of the amount of times Ben Davies bundled into Townsend when the ball had already gone.
To be fair Kavanaugh originally gave the pen.We really need to start driving a media agenda against certain referees, make it abundantly clear that Kavanaugh Moss Atkinson Probert Mason and Oliver aren’t welcome at Goodison due to their overt kopite bias and dreadful standard of refereeing they’ve displayed.
Got lucky not hiring nuno at Everton, could have been us.
If Kavanaugh was too willing to take the opportunity to not give the penalty then why did he give it in the first place, you're too deep down the rabbit hole lad. ?Must be a clear and obvious error to overturn the infield decision. That wasn’t. That was Moss looking for a way out of us getting a penalty and Kavanaugh only too willing to take the opportunity.