There's an interview with Dr Peter Vint, the new Academy Head , on the OS . He's saying all the right things and potentially an exciting appointment for the club bringing in different expertise. It will be interesting to see if he also tackles two things mentioned above.
@bluebrotha77 mentions the 4 coaches in the Academy and Holland mentions coaches too. It may be "unique" to rotate 4 coaches but does it work? It's the players we are developing at this level, not the coaches . Does rotation make for confusion and some unsettling at such a young age? The best spell our U18s have had this year was the first 6 or 7 games where it was noticeable that they used a fairly settled team in this period with the same players playing regularly. You need a degree of rotation to find out just how good some are, but undoubtedly settled sides and settled coaches pay dividends too.
I'm with
@mightymoyes re some of the places we've sent our youngsters to this season. Roberto is big on making sure youngsters he's purchased can face the rigours of English football, something he's mentioned with Leandro, Henen and Tarashaj. They seem to want to toughen our local youngsters too, and maybe Ledson and Walsh's loans to League2 will do that given they are both abrasive/competive players , but the loans to National League North and below that have occurred, Brewster, Dyson, Duffus etc don't seem to make a lot of sense in terms of developing a skill set - I just can't see them playing skilfull football that will progress them at that level. In contrast, our most successful loanee this season appears to be Conor Grant playing in League 1 at a level which is allowing him to develop his skills. Same could be said of Kenny's loan at Wigan , Pennington at Coventry last season. We can't stick them all in at League 1 level when they are only 18 but it's probably the league to aim for with a balance of right skill level and likelihood that youngsters would get regular games at that level.