Tipp blue
If I agreed with you, we’d both be wrong.
@GrandOldTeam or @roydo I see you are online now, if possible could you move this thread to world football, I created it in the wrong place.. thanksWorld football
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
@GrandOldTeam or @roydo I see you are online now, if possible could you move this thread to world football, I created it in the wrong place.. thanksWorld football
Thanks@GrandOldTeam or @roydo I see you are online now, if possible could you move this thread to world football, I created it in the wrong place.. thanks
Not having a go mate. Just all these threads are annoying me@GrandOldTeam or @roydo I see you are online now, if possible could you move this thread to world football, I created it in the wrong place.. thanks
The Euros showed how fun football can be when even the best teams have to actually work to win matches. Italy, Spain and England were the best organized and in the running for most talented but none had an easy run. And teams like Denmark and the Swiss could stay competitive by playing to the talent they had. Club football doesn't have this and frankly the pandemic is only serving to make it worse as only really City, Chelsea, United and PSG from all of Europe have spent significant money.
So I guess I'm a bit disheartened because I really do think the lack of financial controls is letting the competitiveness of the sport slip away now.
I know, when I created it I had the feeling that it may be more Everton related than it ended up being, hence the edit after I'd posted it.Not having a go mate. Just all these threads are annoying me![]()
FFP isn't financial control the way I'm defining it. It's really mobility control. It's not designed to stop the top clubs spending whatever they feel like. A real spending cap that was not based on revenue and therefore not inherently unfair is what I'm talking about.Financial control is whats destroyed football.
Everton cant spend £10 million on a player but Chelsea can spend £95+ million on Lukaku because they have loads of fans overseas buying their overpriced tat.
FFP isn't financial control the way I'm defining it. It's really mobility control. It's not designed to stop the top clubs spending whatever they feel like. A real spending cap that was not based on revenue and therefore not inherently unfair is what I'm talking about.
FFP isn't stopping Everton from competing anyway. Even if we could spend what we wanted within the rules we can't buy two 100m players in a summer like City are about to do.
Yes exactly. That's financial control. What they have right now is "we don't want anyone upsetting the hierarchy" control. I'd love football with a salary cap. City having an entire 18 of players who each would be the best player at at least 8 teams in the league is ridiculous.If you wanted proper fairness and equality in controls its a salary or transfer cap across the board - not Everton can spend £30 million this summer and x amount of wages but Man Utd can spend £150 million and XXXXX amount of wages.
Yes exactly. That's financial control. What they have right now is "we don't want anyone upsetting the hierarchy" control. I'd love football with a salary cap. City having an entire 18 of players who each would be the best player at at least 8 teams in the league is ridiculous.
Good post.Maybe it's an age thing. I get far more pleasure out of watching The Big Match Revisited, old football DVDs from the 60s, 70,s and 80s, current international football, and, strangely enough, the latter stages of the Champions League in pre-pandemic times than I do any of the domestic leagues in Europe.
But it's not really age - it's the realisation that domestic club leagues in England and Europe are fantastically rigged. There was always wealth and inequality, but there was still competition. That's now gone in the Premier League outside of City, Chelsea, and United. Arsenal are a case in point: a mid-table club as if Graham and Wenger never happened. We've been mid-table for 30 years. Newcastle are strugglers, Leeds and Villa yo-yos, Spurs irrelevant.
The World Cup and Euros benefits from the fact that players cannot simply "transfer" between nations, unless they are Brazilians to Qatar... That keeps those competitions compelling, if not necessarily top quality. The latter stages of the Champions League is compelling because pretty much all of the last 8 are mega rich and so can compete on some level. But domestic football? Rigged. Look at Spain. Clubs cravenly submit to the big two in terms of TV deals and financial regulation. We won't mention France where PSG have simply hoovered up galacticos where their rivals are Lille. Even in Germany, where there is a huge competition from 2nd to 18th, Bayern are in a different financial league (albeit one they created organically through superb management with no need for oligarchs and sportswashing rogue states - while their peers Hamburger SV, Schalke 04, Werder Bremen, 1860, and Kaiserslautern managed themselves into the lower leagues).
As an Irishman, the hurling is where it's at for me. Real amateur sportsmen doing amazing things without the utterly rigged circus we are all obliged to pretend doesn't exist in football. Looking at Messi crying last week, I can only surmise that football has jumped the shark. The money paid to these players now is beyond obscene. Not that Messi, a megastar, is overpaid (even if he is) - more that mediocrities in our squad can clear 50k a week simply for turning up for training.
The competition is gone in most leagues and tournaments, so enjoy the football for the talent and restrict your enagagement to those that offer real jeopeardy - the international tournaments, the CL last 8, and our matches against Southampton, Norwich, and Newcastle.
Well the other option is the PL realizing that they are the Super League but only if they want to be and making it possible for a little bit more competitive setup. Because as far as revenue goes it's the PL and everyone else. Which is why the ESL plans had six PL clubs and only three from Spain and Italy. They know where the eyes are.Its why for me the ESL has to happen - the elite clubs are too big and powerful to concede control and influence now.
Even if all the top players left and wages/TV revenue etc across the board massively reduced football would be better off in the long run not just in England but across Europes top leagues.