aglee
Player Valuation: £8m
In a Wallace & Gromit kind of way I envision BFS having gravy boat wallpaper in his house - and a framed picture of a tub of Bisto.Gravy…..
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
In a Wallace & Gromit kind of way I envision BFS having gravy boat wallpaper in his house - and a framed picture of a tub of Bisto.Gravy…..
How much do you think they’ve been able to right off due to the Icelander affair?
Which is what FFP has always been designed to do - keep the scabs in power.
Only way to break it is with a Gulf State buyout ie Newcastle.
Shambles.
The 105 model was out of date when first put in place. It isn't comparable to player prices whatsoever now! It should be a percentage of that clubs revenue. i.e. 20% over spend/loses.. etc..Yeah, exactly, and I wonder how long the 105 limit will stay in place, although obviously having already fallen foul of it ourselves hopefully it stays in place for other clubs who are likely to hit it in the future.
Everyone talks about the cost of relegation but there comes a point where given inflation in transfer fees and wages, and the spending race between the lower half clubs, the cost of not getting relegated comes close to being the same.
Clubs are spending fortunes just to keep pace: Southampton spent about 50mil in January and it’s done nothing for them, Wolves gambled taking on a 40m obligation that had they gone down would’ve immediately swallowed their parachute payment. The amount you need to spend just to move a bit further up the table is crazy and probably unsustainable. If we can somehow retain Pl status with net zero spending until the stadium completes it’ll be an achievement.
Yeah it seems strange that when players can cost 105 that’s still a three year permitted loss: with one career ending chalkenge to Enzo, say, Chelsea could effectively lose 105m in the space of a couple of seconds. Not that I’d lose any sleep over it, but still.The 105 model was out of date when first put in place. It isn't comparable to player prices whatsoever now! It should be a percentage of that clubs revenue. i.e. 20% over spend/loses.. etc..
It's like the Bundesliga, only with more clubs with that kind of revenue. That league has the same team win almost every year, we have the same teams win almost every year. It's been the same team most years lately because they have the best manager to go with solid recruitment.Only way the Premier League ever becomes a level playing field is with some sort of salary cap and standardised transfer budget.
Without that, the richest clubs, in the their cycles of Champions League rewards etc, are way too far clear of the rest.
Even Brighton - who are superbly run and get almost every strategic decision completely right - will struggle to close the gap to the 'big 6' and will be on the constant conveyor belt of losing their managers/players to bigger clubs.
There's an old saying in NCAA basketball over here - "The NCAA was so upset with Kentucky that they're going to give Cleveland State two more years' probation." Sadly, money talks.Wouldn't surprise me if they got off and we get slammed it really wouldn't.
it's a matter of time before the premier league sets up it's own platform like a Netflix of football. When that happens the top clubs will demand a bigger slice of the cake as they'll argue they attract the subscribers. The gab will just get bigger and biggerOnly way the Premier League ever becomes a level playing field is with some sort of salary cap and standardised transfer budget.
Without that, the richest clubs, in the their cycles of Champions League rewards etc, are way too far clear of the rest.
Even Brighton - who are superbly run and get almost every strategic decision completely right - will struggle to close the gap to the 'big 6' and will be on the constant conveyor belt of losing their managers/players to bigger clubs.
It's like comparing a small mound in your back garden with EverestTalksport there, that Alex Crook was on talking about City's charges.
"and oh course Everton are in a similar situation"
oh aye. 114 charges difference like. But the same thing.
See Newcastle are about to sign some massive new Saudi sponsor, ie the same sh*te city have been pulling for years as a way to get around FFP.
Crazy how teams like the derbys, Pompey's, readings have been fined, deducted points etc and yet the rich teams where the money isn't a problem to them can just continue to bend every possible rule
Wouldn't surprise me if they got off and we get slammed it really wouldn't.
Followed by a rule change the season after that would mean our spending would have been compliant from then onward ….Wouldn't surprise me if they got off and we get slammed it really wouldn't.