Sorry but you completely misrepresenting the outcome.
Not one of the clubs was charged with any breech of PL rules because the specific offence wasn’t covered there wasn’t any fine
Heres an example of the coverage
The six clubs involved in proposals to form a European Super League have today acknowledged once again that their actions were a mistake, and have reconfirmed their commitment to the Premier League and the future of the English game," the statement read.
"They have wholeheartedly apologised to their fans, fellow clubs, the Premier League and The FA.
https://paid.outbrain.com/network/r...INDhCKfLM3tp4sdDPAHsUpnX2K3G0Q&c=c5f82210&v=4
"As a gesture of goodwill, the clubs have collectively agreed to make a contribution of £22m, which will go towards the good of the game, including new investment in support for fans, grassroots football and community programmes.
"Furthermore, the clubs have agreed to support rule changes so that any similar actions in the future would lead to a 30-point deduction.
The problem was then that a disrepute charge that would , I think , be an FA charge would almost certainly fail because no rules were broken