Not in a bad way, just referring to both you and duality."the likes of". You what m8?
Just if either of you disagree then shows you are saying something right.
That’s all.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Not in a bad way, just referring to both you and duality."the likes of". You what m8?
Honestly believe Southgate wanted to play for a draw here and it showed. Wouldn't have mattered who the striker is in most games imo, especially this one for that same reason.Being offered out via DM incoming
Kane's been a quality player for a long time for Spurs and England, but the goose is cooked imo. Would it have mattered if Watkins had started? Probably not overall.
Kane isn’t the one holding the team back. The decision maker isSo you do agree with it then?![]()
That one made sense… first time. WellThanks mate, glad you managed to read that one as it's literally 3 words.
You've progressed to a sentence mate, soon you'll be able to read and comprehend a whole paragraph.That one made sense… first time. Well
Done.
WHAT! I don't agree with 99% of what Duality says on hereNot in a bad way, just referring to both you and duality.
Just if either of you disagree then shows you are saying something right.
That’s all.
Maybe even more to be honest, especially Everton related really.WHAT! I don't agree with 99% of what Duality says on here![]()
Cheers… getting there. It’s tough trying to make sense of posters. I understand.You've progressed to a sentence mate, soon you'll be able to read and comprehend a whole paragraph.
Proud of your progress tonight.
Doubt it.Cheers… getting there. It’s tough trying to make sense of posters. I understand.
My main issues with Kane and England:
His entire game these days is playing more of a 10/CF by collecting deep and trying to link play and as such he is not in the box when we need him, nor does he have the pace to get there. He's also then occupying zones of the pitch where our best two attacking mids (Foden and Bellingham) want to operate. It means the opposition CB's have nothing to do and is why we looked SO bad up against a few bad teams that used 3 at the back.
Watkins runs deep constantly and Toney is a belting target man. Both occupy 1-2 CB's, are a nightmare to defend against, and also don't clog up the space for the attacking mids.
If Kane starts, we need two very wide players (Gordon and Saka) and then a midfielder to break beyond but can't have Foden and Jude behind.
If we want Foden and Bellingham central Kane cannot start.
True… it is hard work when responding to the likes of you. Not sure anyone could understand.Doubt it.
Those two statements don't make a lot of sense given that Southgate is the manager.Nothing to do with just defending corners.
General play he drops far too deep and when the play does get beyond the defence he is always 40-50 yards behind.
That’s not the way he should be playing and is not all on Southgate.
That’s him being old And slow.
I agree.I am trying though.
Think they all pace and harrass defence. I honestly think Kane offered nothingJust like how it's already being overstated how Watkins and Toney are the answer to this problem, where they'd be equally as donkeypoo.
Ok I apologise and in knowing the 2nd part I would suggest Southgate shouldn’t be playing him so in response to your point then it is Southgate’s fault.Those two statements don't make a lot of sense given that Southgate is the manager.