2021/22 Frank Lampard

[TheBigIguana]

So we go to win now when we replace Lampard with the mystical Next Big Thing™, which will definitely win us the league within the span of less than a month and is already lined up to join, right?


So who is it, in your opinion?

Oh no that's not the plan. I'd like us to go from win never mode into we're still never winning anything because City and Chelsea have untold billions but at least we'll have fun watching the team play mode.

 

[nsno-chris]

Yeah let's leave Big Oil and rag these Rafalites everywhere, it's much more fun.

Bouncing from one to other, handing slaps out for fun

 

[DualityNSNO]

Oh no that's not the plan. I'd like us to go from win never mode into we're still never winning anything because City and Chelsea have untold billions but at least we'll have fun watching the team play mode.

So, you've evaded the question again, very davek of you, admirable.

Who is it, who do you suggest we hire when we, as a thank you for (potentially) saving us, apparently fire Lampard without giving him a chance to play his own way?

 

[Curtis]

It's pointless. He will deflect and deflect and ignore etc. There will be 1000s of posts of him right up Benitez' backside, but he won't ever admit he was wrong.

With the way he deflects and contorts his views I'm pretty sure he's a member of parliament or some type of politician lol

 

[Goat]

Bouncing from one to other, handing slaps out for fun

At least Big Oil has the club's best interests at heart, the Rafael 8 are worse than rat poo.

 

[TheBigIguana]

So, you've evaded the question again, very davek of you, admirable.

Who is it, who do you suggest we hire when we, as a thank you for (potentially) saving us, apparently fire Lampard without giving him a chance to play his own way?

I've said a couple of times I've not actually looked into it at all.

He's had a chance btw, I said it when Dyche got fired, you never have to do this.

 

[nsno-chris]

At least Big Oil has the club's best interests at heart, the Rafael 8 are worse than rat poo.

It’s his only saving grace; the other lot would defo cross the picket line and nick your wages

 

[Curtis]

Oh no that's not the plan. I'd like us to go from win never mode into we're still never winning anything because City and Chelsea have untold billions but at least we'll have fun watching the team play mode.

you never me gave a name for manager and i'm not talking about next season. the smooth offensive manager we should of gone for instead of Frank in January

 

[TheBigIguana]

you never gave a name for manager and i'm not talking about next season. the smooth offensive manager we should of gone for instead of Frank in JanuaryView attachment 164303

I wanted to hire Frank in January

 

[Curtis]

I wanted to hire Frank in January

but who would of done better and been more effective in employing a more aesthetically pleasing philosophy that was available?

 

[TheBigIguana]

but who would of done better and been more effective in employing a more aesthetically pleasing philosophy that was available?

It isn't about aesthetics.

Again look at Conte, very ugly football, but very effective football. They beat the crap out of teams with 35% possession. I'm fine with us doing that too. This isn't the same.

 

[DualityNSNO]

I've said a couple of times I've not actually looked into it at all.

He's had a chance btw, I said it when Dyche got fired, you never have to do this.

He's had a chance of an injured team in a hunt for points however they can, and you want him to win with style?

Arsed. Leave style for when we're safe.

 

[Marius57]

It isn't about aesthetics.

Again look at Conte, very ugly football, but very effective football. They beat the crap out of teams with 35% possession. I'm fine with us doing that too. This isn't the same.

So now it's acceptable to have low possession?

Lampard tried to play a more free-flowing football. We were struggling. He changed it to a more pragmatic, 'ugly' style, and we have won 2, and drawn one of the last 4. But that's not what you want either.

 

[Curtis]

It isn't about aesthetics.

Again look at Conte, very ugly football, but very effective football. They beat the crap out of teams with 35% possession. I'm fine with us doing that too. This isn't the same.

i don't even think Conte's football is ugly but i get what you're saying. in retrospect can you think of an alternative who would of been more effective with our dregs?

 

[TheBigIguana]

So now it's acceptable to have low possession?

Lampard tried to play a more free-flowing football. We were struggling. He changed it to a more pragmatic, 'ugly' style, and we have won 2, and drawn one of the last 4. But that's not what you want either.

It's about chances, create more, concede less, create more high quality ones, concede less. You can do this in many ways, Lampard has yet to find one.