They are a crap wum, but i think "ive done more supporting than you" could catch on across the grand old team internet chatroom website
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
The better fan argument is always funny. But "more supporting" did make me laugh. Like you can just turn off when you support.They are a crap wum, but i think "ive done more supporting than you" could catch on across the grand old team internet chatroom website
Lets see ya Swimmy badges then.Come on post your match ticket stubs, pal. I can prove far and away that i've don't more supporting than you have. Cognate Mar[kedly stupid]ius57
How do you quantify the amount of supporting one has done? Is there a points based system for each action that could be deemed 'supporting'?Come on post your match ticket stubs, pal. I can prove far and away that i've don't more supporting than you have. Cognate Mar[kedly stupid]ius57
I've gone bankrupt buying cars on Cazoo lad, even though I can't drive lar.How do you quantify the amount of supporting one has done? Is there a points based system for each action that could be deemed 'supporting'?
Think this needs exploring in greater depth. We could start a league table. 'GOTs most supportering leaderboard'.
Hi mate,Come on post your match ticket stubs, pal. I can prove far and away that i've don't more supporting than you have. Cognate Mar[kedly stupid]ius57
Everybody just says it when they complete a period of supporting, the length of the time period being at everyone's own discretion. I am currently surfing a strong wave of support which will end for a fag break in about 2minutes! Beat that! Top of the Table baaaaabyHow do you quantify the amount of supporting one has done? Is there a points based system for each action that could be deemed 'supporting'?
Think this needs exploring in greater depth. We could start a league table. 'GOTs most supportering leaderboard'.
He sounds like a good fella.Hi mate,
Post yours because I’ve heard through the grape vine that nobody believes you. In fact, one poster has dm’d me and called you a lying toad
There's a clear metric to determine a superfan during this season how many times have you pissed your pants when we lost fearing that indicated inevitable relegation? if it's less then ten times sorry you're not true fan material. Bonus points for hostile meandering tirades against managers and other fansHow do you quantify the amount of supporting one has done? Is there a points based system for each action that could be deemed 'supporting'?
Think this needs exploring in greater depth. We could start a league table. 'GOTs most supportering leaderboard'.
Oooooo. I might make top 5!There's a clear metric to determine a superfan during this season how many times have you pissed your pants when we lost fearing that indicated inevitable relegation? if it's less then ten times sorry you're not true fan material. Bonus points for hostile meandering tirades against managers and other fans
Really? Most pundits (including RS) said it was a nailed on penalty. Guess you know better.You shouldn't blame the result on not getting a decision. You shouldn't go all in and call the game corrupt without having strong evidence. The supposed foul was soft as. It's not likely it would have been given whoever we were playing. That all undermined Super Frankies silly behaviour, but that's ok because he's been charged, will get fined and hopefully will learn something from it. Won't hold my breath though
A world wide viewership, with large world wide fan bases for top clubs, exports of around 8billion per season, doesn't benefit the FA financially whatsoever?Too heavy? It was plain daft. So let's see if the tin foil hat stuff is a runner. You're assuming that the FA who are responsible for the referees are deliberately giving decisions to promote better viewing figures for the Premier League (and favouring certain teams) which they don't benefit from financially whatsoever?Clearly grounds for a major crime ring this one. We need a public inquiry!
Or the other way to look at this ... don't judge me too harshly for my dire football - there's a conspiracy people should be focusing on ... the man's a fraud.
I guarantee you that if he was stupid enough to think (and say) that he didn't get a result because of a referee not awarding an advantage for something that was fairly dubious at best he would definitely be charged. It is ludicrous to suggest the game is bent. That doesn't mean things like VAR couldn't be made more transparent, but Super Frankie didn't ask for that - he said it was biased in favour of another team. His evidence .... er tin foil hat time. The man's an idiot. He's passing the buck for setting us up to surrender the game and condemned us to no threat when he moved Gordon from the left wing where he was actually very effective. He did the same at Burnley.
Too heavy? It was plain daft. So let's see if the tin foil hat stuff is a runner. You're assuming that the FA who are responsible for the referees are deliberately giving decisions to promote better viewing figures for the Premier League (and favouring certain teams) which they don't benefit from financially whatsoever?Clearly grounds for a major crime ring this one. We need a public inquiry!
Or the other way to look at this ... don't judge me too harshly for my dire football - there's a conspiracy people should be focusing on ... the man's a fraud.
Come on post your match ticket stubs, pal. I can prove far and away that i've don't more supporting than you have. Cognate Mar[kedly stupid]ius57
There was an increase of 32 in total (across the league) vs the season before it.Well he could have had a conversation about it without bringing the game into disrepute.
The stats put up are cherry picked ones from the Covid affected season. When they changed the rules for that season regarding hand balls if you recall and loads of penalties were given.