GOT Wrestle Fest Fan Thread

[RomanReigns]

 

[SuperTimCahill]

Can’t believe they released Rusev. These clowns don’t see a star when it’s right in front of them. Really excited to see what he does next. Also my old favorite Zack Ryder

 

[RomanReigns]

Surprised a few wrestlers survived the culling like Titus O’Neil, Mojo Rawley and Bo Dallas

then you have wrestlers like Kane and big show who make 2 appearances a year

 

[SuperTimCahill]

So rope break is a thing in no holds barred matches now? Other than that I very much enjoyed Dynamite this week.

 

[Ring master]

 

[Connor]

So rope break is a thing in no holds barred matches now? Other than that I very much enjoyed Dynamite this week.

No Holds Barred is a No DQ match, not a No Rules match which means rope break is a thing

 

[Grinch]

Can’t believe they released Rusev. These clowns don’t see a star when it’s right in front of them. Really excited to see what he does next. Also my old favorite Zack Ryder

Rusev was really a shocker! A fan favorite. great in ring. I also loved that wrestlemania tank entrance

 

[Ring master]

Rusev was really a shocker! A fan favorite. great in ring. I also loved that wrestlemania tank entrance

In a way there has been many rumours over the months that he wanted out,so that maybe have helped the WWE-suppose we will never know
Ref Mike Chioda and Drake Maverick were 2 little shocks for me

 

[SuperTimCahill]

No Holds Barred is a No DQ match, not a No Rules match which means rope break is a thing

So if a wrestler doesn't break the hold when the opponent grabs the ropes, what happens then? DQ in a no DQ match?

 

[Kenshin]

I think some of the releases may have been voluntary rather than forced.

The likes of rusev , the club and Kurt angle may have been ones to step up and accept it and others who didn't have much TV time are the ones forced .

I mean the club can go back to Japan any time they want and rusev won't have any shortage of offers when everything is back to normal.

 

[Wizard]

So if a wrestler doesn't break the hold when the opponent grabs the ropes, what happens then? DQ in a no DQ match?

If I understand the rules correctly, the rope break puts an end to the move so any submission as a result wouldn't count as a win. So if the opponent gets a rope break you need to move them away from the ropes and reapply the hold. The reason for this is that falls have to happen in the ring (unless a falls count anywhere type match) and a rope break takes you "out of the ring". You can't be disqualified for holding on, you just can't win.

 

[N.S.N.O.]

The perfect voice for that job, made every Title change seem important with two words... RIP Fink

 

[Connor]

If I understand the rules correctly, the rope break puts an end to the move so any submission as a result wouldn't count as a win. So if the opponent gets a rope break you need to move them away from the ropes and reapply the hold. The reason for this is that falls have to happen in the ring (unless a falls count anywhere type match) and a rope break takes you "out of the ring". You can't be disqualified for holding on, you just can't win.

This

 

[RomanReigns]

The perfect voice for that job, made every Title change seem important with two words... RIP Fink

agreed

iconic voice

 

[SuperTimCahill]

If I understand the rules correctly, the rope break puts an end to the move so any submission as a result wouldn't count as a win. So if the opponent gets a rope break you need to move them away from the ropes and reapply the hold. The reason for this is that falls have to happen in the ring (unless a falls count anywhere type match) and a rope break takes you "out of the ring". You can't be disqualified for holding on, you just can't win.

This actually makes sense. Though the logical thing would still be to keep the submission hold locked on just to keep weakening your opponent