A 6 isn't crap, no.
A 6 is like your average-decent display. You ideally want your players to be hitting 7/8s every week.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
- Status
A 6 is like your average-decent display. You ideally want your players to be hitting 7/8s every week.
Again, I'll have a look later, but I don't think it actually is...
evertonarntwe
Player Valuation: £35m
MikeH72
Player Valuation: £100m
A 6/10 is your bog standard unspectacular rating. The sort of performance the likes of a Tom Cleverley or Morgan Schneiderlin would make a career off, not a £45m playmaker.
I like stats. I like analytics. But the only stat that matters is the scoreboard and he didn’t affect it so, sell.
Papa Shango
Player Valuation: £70m
I get what you are saying but it doesn't tell a full story does it? If Richarlison for example beats three men and passes to Sigurdsson who's marker slips over and falls on his backside and he then lays on DCL for a chance he gets the assist. There is zero context there. Then you will get a game where the opponent does a man marking job on Sigurdsson so he has no time to do anything, but his play results in others making space for themselves as he had tied an opponent up all game, where is the stat for that?
Assists in general are a dodgy way to judge players. Not as bad as the made up stats like mentioned above but still a very simple way to look at players. For me the only possible benefit stats can create in football is if you are maybe looking for a certain type of player but even then your eyes will always tell you more than numbers. All the stats pointing out that Sigurdsson (or whoever) has been great means nothing when by simply watching him you can see that he has been pretty average for us thus far.
Papa Shango
Player Valuation: £70m
No, I really am not.
Stats may be "facts" but the facts can be used to prove or disprove anything you want. Any fact a person would care to use in football I could quite easily shout down and say why it cant be used as an example.
It is not a statistic based game due to the many, many variables. Any statistical analysis needs some form of standard to base them off and football doesn't offer that.
yeh, so like I said, not his best game on Sunday but he did okay.
need more from him, not disputing that.
Toffeelover
Player Valuation: £80m
To do okay is not any where near good enough in my book.
Barnfred 55
Player Valuation: £80m
I think we have to accept that players will not play to the peak of their ability all of the time. Also, that different players have different levels of "peak". I think our fans problem, and possibly a problem with fans universally, is that we come to judge players performances against their peak. I always thought this was an issue with Barkley. Often he'd under perform against what we know he can do and get absolutely sledged on here, when in reality he was quite possibly still our best player on the day.
Siggy came here with a reputation (and a price tag) which, I think it's fair to say, he hasn't lived up to often enough. He is one of our more capable and talented players, not to mention experienced. We need all of our players to play close to their best more often than not. When Siggy does that, because he is such a talented player at his best, he should be getting scores of 8/9s on a regular basis. A below par Siggy should comfortably still be scoring 7s or at worse a 6.
We need him to start performing for us. So far this season, IMO, he had a 9 against Southampton and possibly a 7.5 against Bournemouth. The rest have been 6s. That's not good enough for our main playmaker.
If he was Ross Barkley, he`d have been hounded out of the club by now.
evertonarntwe
Player Valuation: £35m
he wasn't hounded out tho, he's a rat
Nyhus
#EvertonNorge
I agree. His top level is high, but we dont see it often enough. He’s been better this season, but he needs to do more to keep his place every match. And thats from a guy who loves Siggy as a player, but he is too invisible at times.
True.
That chances created stat is a load of hogwash. It counts any time a player gets a shot off, regardless of the quality of the chance.
Gylfi doesn't create good quality chances, if he did do he would have far more assists to his name in an Everton shirt. His corners and Free kicks for headers all count towards that stat and inflate the appearance of him being a creative player when in reality he's just a crap set pieces merchant.
In the bin with him. He's been badly crap for what we paid and in going to continue to use the price as a stick to beat him with until he starts delivering at the level that was expected of him when that money was paid.
Without a target man to hit with his crosses, corners and Free kicks then he is hopeless as a creative outlet and that's what he needs to be to play in that position when we are going to keep playing defensive players in the two midfield positions behind him.
Gylfi doesn't create good quality chances, if he did do he would have far more assists to his name in an Everton shirt. His corners and Free kicks for headers all count towards that stat and inflate the appearance of him being a creative player when in reality he's just a crap set pieces merchant.
In the bin with him. He's been badly crap for what we paid and in going to continue to use the price as a stick to beat him with until he starts delivering at the level that was expected of him when that money was paid.
Without a target man to hit with his crosses, corners and Free kicks then he is hopeless as a creative outlet and that's what he needs to be to play in that position when we are going to keep playing defensive players in the two midfield positions behind him.
- Status