People who legitimately criticise an underperforming player cannot be classed as “boo boys” though.
There's legitimate criticism, which is fine.
And then there's at least half of the criticism of him that just isn't really based on anything other than we paid a lot of money for him, and that should suddenly mean he becomes a player he isn't (i.e. a deep-lying playmaker and goalscoring number 10 all mixed into one).
He created our most chances last season, and he got injured in March. Overall he was consistently decent from November to March, with some standout performances. Worth noting that for the majority of the time he played on the left (where I do think he can do a job), and had Martina behind him. It meant that when he got the ball in that role he had no choice but to look for the Hollywood pass or go back, because he didn't have any support from his full-back. The few times Martina did get forward, and we got the ball to Gylfi, he scored or created a chance.
He's great from set pieces and then on Saturday showed how good he can be from open play as well. His pressing was key to us, and that's why he'll be a key player for us in home games this season especially.
It'll be different away from home, because the pressing has to be a bit less full throttle at times, but at home Sigurdsson will play pretty much as a second striker dropping deep when we have the ball, imo.
Him and Tosun both press, we have the pace of Walcott/Richarlison (Lookman as well, hopefully, and Bernard) to sweep up after that and then suddenly we're breaking at teams.
A poor first half of his season last year in a team with no style or substance, and a manager with no idea of how they wanted the team to play.
He was good after that, but it seems to get overlooked. So that's what I think
@Kinky Koeman was referring to.