Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Yes he has a good ratio of goals/assists to touches, there's no argument there. The problem though, is there's no obvious reason why he should have so few touches in the first place - that's what we're talking about. It seems a fairly logical suggestion that if he could manage to involve himself in the game more, he could have more influence on it. He doesn't play lovely one touch football where he receives a lot of the ball and moves it on quickly, he just goes long periods without actually touching the thing, which is incredibly frustrating when you're in the sort of situation Iceland are now, or we were often last season.I am well aware, but that's what people are saying. That's EXACTLY what they are saying. And I agree with you, their logic is insane and they don't know football or understand it.
But if you find it OKAY that he doesn't hold the ball, his production per touch is insane in terms of goals, assists, key passes, whatever stupid metric you want to use. I'm not sure what there is to argue.
The other issue is that many here don't watch matches of other teams and never saw him play before he came to Everton. Last year was his least productive year, but there were pretty obvious reasons for that. It was a bad year for lots of Everton players.
Sure, but that year sure looks like an anomaly based on his career. And quite a few Everton players had bad years. Compared to the rest of the lot, he was good, but yes, the team as a whole was bad. We all suffered through it. I just don't understand the hate for the guy.Because he was bog average.
He may be great for us next year, let's hope he is. But so far he has been a very run of the mill Everton player excuses or not.
Yes, goals and creating goals don't matter.
Sure, but that year sure looks like an anomaly based on his career. And quite a few Everton players had bad years. Compared to the rest of the lot, he was good, but yes, the team as a whole was bad. We all suffered through it. I just don't understand the hate for the guy.
Free Ricky Ryder
Yes he has a good ratio of goals/assists to touches, there's no argument there. The problem though, is there's no obvious reason why he should have so few touches in the first place - that's what we're talking about. It seems a fairly logical suggestion that if he could mange to involve himself in the game more, he could have more influence on it. He doesn't play lovely one touch football where he receives a lot of the ball and moves it on quickly, he just goes long periods without actually touching the thing, which is incredibly frustrating when you're in the sort of situation Iceland are now, or we were often last season.
Which one?