I'm puzzled, Gordon. You've just stated in another thread that there are circumstances in which vigilantism is permissible. Which is it? Or are you saying that the police are not allowed to do what private citizens are?
thought you might pick up on that
the police are there to protect society - all of it. They're required to play by the rules that they enforce.
I never said vigilatism was permissable, merely inevitable, perhaps understandable in some circumstances, and that I couldn't guarantee in that particular case that I personally would be above it. At no point did I say it was right