Equal pay for male porn stars is clearly the real issue here.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Is Woman's Football an actual real sport ?
- Thread starter Kurt.
- Start date
- Status
Equal pay for male porn stars is clearly the real issue here.
Being dicks to each other for no real reason is kind of this forum's motif.
If they all did proper porn, they would get it. We love our porn stars.
No sympathy for the bad hetros.
You say that as if it's a change from the norm..
mrs the esk
Player Valuation: £5m
The original point was that men and women are different and have different physical attributes. Hence male and female sport is different, one is not necessarily better or more valuable than the other.
Do you reckon male porn stars get paid by the inch?
I fume xhamster when you use the search function it doesn't do hetro only by default so you get a load of previews of lads doing nasty things to each other.
Puts a hetro off his stride somewhat.
Then why did Billie Jean King compete in the battle of the sexes? Why do the best woman in a lot of sports, cricket, formula 1, snooker etc, want to play in the men's leagues?
Frank Gallagher
Player Valuation: £50m
mrs the esk
Player Valuation: £5m
They should hope so because if they got paid by piecework they'd struggle.....
I love watching it. Seriously. I'm far more a supporter of the USA women's team than the mens. Japan, in particular, is really skilled and entertaining. And what I particularly like the most, sappy as it sounds, is the sportmanship. No histrionic injury faking (except for a few unfortunate S. American teams), few idiotic tantrums/head-games during play, and very few ego-driven unstable weirdos (e.g., Vidal, Suarez, those idiots from LC in that orgy), and far less money in the game, so the players are playing much more for the glory, not for the endorsements (though obviously they pursue these when it arises), not for the twitter followers, and not for the ridiculous transfer fees. When the game is good, it's quite pure. I'm thinking particularly of the game Japan-USA 2011 world cup final. Great game. No idiots rolling around on the ground holding their shin guards when they felt a breath on their left ear, technically sound, and just excellent athletes gutting it out. I think what varies from match to match and team to team, more so than the men's game, is the skill level. But dump an equal amount of money into the women's game (but see my caveats above...), change a bunch of social attitudes about women playing the game, and things will move more towards equilibrium. Doubt if it will ever compare to the men's game, but comparing right now isn't really a level playing field with huge social and financial obstacles in the way. And I'm not sure if comparing the "men's game" to the "women's game" is the way to view it in the first place.
The honest answer is that it isn't.
Because in real sports you would kick the woman beater off your international team.
Because in real sports you would kick the woman beater off your international team.
Elong
The fire rises
I think it's just for the money and the fame Beardo, pretty shallow.
mrs the esk
Player Valuation: £5m
Because of the irrational differential in pay.
Why should the best of one gender be paid more or less than the best of the other gender?
- Status