Jackson dies.

[steevie]

What's with your attitude today Steevie?

All I said was some people will remember him for his music, some people will remember him for the paedophilia. And judging by this thread, and plenty of others, that's true.

My previous post was aimed at pbsuper mate.

 

[Azzbot]

My previous post was aime at pbsuper mate.

Ahh, it's just that you quoted dutch toffees reply to my previous reply.

And Bruce, you can bet your life he wont. You know why? Because he hasn't got a great singing career to mask it all

 

[Dutch Toffee]

..... Other than to state the obvious that the latest post of pbsuper, shows the lack of maturity he has. PATHETIC!!

Refuse to get to involved in this, as I can see getting this thread going out of control. Last thing I'll say about this subject is, that I can understand a lot of MJ fans will be saddened by his death, as he was a great musician. Probably on the same level as Elvis Presley, but that's not to say, we should overlook all the things outside the music busisness. As said, last thing I'll comment on this. Case closed as far as I'm concerned.

 

[steevie]

Ahh, it's just that you quoted dutch toffees reply to my previous reply.

The post you refered to ..... Other than to state the obvious that the latest post of pbsuper, shows the lack of maturity he has. PATHETIC!!

 

[fozzy]

just found this! its interesting!

Michael Jackson's Other Legacy - June 25, 2009

oh and steevie no worrys mate!

have you read this steevie?

 

[Azzbot]

Ahh I'm well and truly confused lid

 

[AdamTheGreatOneB]

I wonder if Gary Glitter will receive the same adulation when he pops his clogs?

The major difference is Jackson wasn't found guilty of any of these crimes whereas Glitter was.

 

[Azzbot]

The major difference is Jackson wasn't found guilty of any of these crimes whereas Glitter was.

And the major difference there was Gary Glitter never had 10's of millions to pay off his victims to be quiet.

 

[fozzy]

The major difference is Jackson wasn't found guilty of any of these crimes whereas Glitter was.

18m dollers is why mate! if he is so innocent then why didnt he sue this bloke for publishing this book?

Amazon.co.uk: Customer Reviews: All That Glitters: The Crime and the Cover-Up

if innocent he would have sued the pants off of him surly!

 

[steevie]

have you read this steevie?

Yes and i believe it to be the lad who claimed Jackson molested him despite him cosying up to him on camera. I did'nt believe that lying little brat then, and i dont believe him now.

 

[AdamTheGreatOneB]

Well you can say what you want but you will never be able to prove that Jackson was guilty of these crimes. I'm not saying he wasn't a disturbed person emotionally, I'm saying he wasn't proven guilty of anything.

 

[fozzy]

Well you can say what you want but you will never be able to prove that Jackson was guilty of these crimes. I'm not saying he wasn't a disturbed person emotionally, I'm saying he wasn't proven guilty of anything.

yep and niether was oj simpson!

 

[AdamTheGreatOneB]

And the major difference there was Gary Glitter never had 10's of millions to pay off his victims to be quiet.

And perhaps that's all they wanted, a truck load of money.

 

[AdamTheGreatOneB]

yep and niether was oj simpson!

Correct.

 

[steevie]

And perhaps that's all they wanted, a truck load of money.

BINGO! It, Nail, On, The, Head are words that spring to mind.