The Equaliser
Player Valuation: £50m
Selling him for overs and getting someone better in maybe after the Cleverley signing?
Something like 10 mill plus Lennon for McCarthy maybe?
You are willing to sell McCarthy for around £16m.
Says it all.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Selling him for overs and getting someone better in maybe after the Cleverley signing?
Something like 10 mill plus Lennon for McCarthy maybe?
You are willing to sell McCarthy for around £16m.
Says it all.
Seems the thread ban bug is catching...You are willing to sell McCarthy for around £16m.
Says it all.
WHAT???????????????????????????????????????????????????????????
Something like 10 mill plus Lennon for McCarthy maybe?
Shocking, isn't it.
I don't see what you are trying to argue here.
it is a saving of probably around £6M-£7M as we don't have to pay a transfer fee. He will get a higher signing on fee.There have been several posters who think that as Everton have signed Cleverley on a "free transfer", the club has nothing to lose.
But the club is committing itself to paying more than £15 million in wages to Cleverley. That's much more than the "transfer fee" of £8 million that has apparently been saved. And we don't know how much of this saving will disappear in a signing on fee for Cleverley and the fee for his agent.
Opinion is divided over the contribution Cleverley will make. If he is a success in the first team, it may prove to be good value in today's football market. If he is not a success, then he will be a very expensive squad player. So there is quite a lot at risk after all.
With all the Sky revenues why is RM looking for freebies when in fact their wages when looked at are far from free in Cleverleys case reports suggest its high wages on a five year deal - reports are he is going after Michael Richards from City who will also want high wages!it is a saving of probably around £6M-£7M as we don't have to pay a transfer fee. He will get a higher signing on fee.
We have to pay him the same wages whether he signs on a 'free' or not
'Free' just denotes we don't have to pay another team to release him. Not that he's doing it for zero wages, fees. bonuses.
I think that we already have the promising young players on the books, but maybe they are not fully ready yet to be regarded as first team players.With all the Sky revenues why is RM looking for freebies when in fact their wages when looked at are far from free in Cleverleys case reports suggest its high wages on a five year deal - reports are he is going after Michael Richards from City who will also want high wages!
Why can we not just go out and buy a promising younger players???????
I know we have a tight budget , but the wages prove the freebies do not come cheap if they turn out to be useless - Look at barry great on loan and it looks like we have a Saha situation once on the contract takes his foot off the gas!
Why can we not just go out and buy a promising younger players???????