Yes. Despite his inconsistency he’s pure class on his day.If everything was agreed and no considerations like squad size, age, wages, would he come here, etc. matter would you sign Ozil?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Yes. Despite his inconsistency he’s pure class on his day.If everything was agreed and no considerations like squad size, age, wages, would he come here, etc. matter would you sign Ozil?
I have used stats - and others have too - to prove that he does pass the ball forward. That's not opinion, it's fact.
I agree entirely that if I had to choose one player to unlock a defence, it wouldn't be Gana. But that's not the point.
Point 1 - I agree.
Point 2 - I disagree and it's blatantly obvious whenever he doesn't play. Not saying he has to start every game, but that means we have to change how we play.
His passing success rate is also fact and it’s really high. But apparently I’m nuts.
Honestly, I think at least he’s our most important player. It’s a different side when he’s not in it.
But I’m sure PSG are in for a lot of our players, so what do I know.
James Forest from Celtic. Love watching him play. 27 so may fancy a change.
Totally agree but to give some balance Walsh was the guy that "found" Kante and Vardy and then spunked ridiculous money on Sandro Ramirez , Bolasie et alBut this is the bloke that found Lozano and got him for cheap in the first place... He's basically saying he'd rather try and do that again rather than overpay. Like what is wrong with that, at all?
Agreed.For me, if we're sticking with the high-intensity pressing style, then yes he is absolutely a key player, and as long as there's Gomes next to him, it can work.
I don't see anything wrong with saying it'd be nice to go out and get a Doucoure/Ndombele (or that type of powerful, box-to-box player) but it doesn't make Gana a bad player.
Offensively Doucoure, for example, would certainly offer more, and he's defensively good - but not as good as Gana.
Just don't get why Gana gets so much stick. He's good at what he does.
For me, if we're sticking with the high-intensity pressing style, then yes he is absolutely a key player, and as long as there's Gomes next to him, it can work.
I don't see anything wrong with saying it'd be nice to go out and get a Doucoure/Ndombele (or that type of powerful, box-to-box player) but it doesn't make Gana a bad player.
Offensively Doucoure, for example, would certainly offer more, and he's defensively good - but not as good as Gana.
Just don't get why Gana gets so much stick. He's good at what he does.
Would upgrade our right side massively.Absolutely not.
Totally agree but to give some balance Walsh was the guy that "found" Kante and Vardy and then spunked ridiculous money on Sandro Ramirez , Bolasie et al
Would upgrade our right side massively.
Hope PSG come in with a bid for Gana in Jan...if anyone would overpay then its them.
Don't get it myself he is an important player in certain games
said before without the ball he is excellent without it he's average
he is massively needed for the hard games where we don't have much of the ball, but the games against the sides who allow us to have the ball ( ie Newcastle Watford etc ) I don't need think he's needed, would rather someone proactive with the ball in midfield instead
gueye does his job excellent but in games where his job isn't needed as much and hes expected to do more on the ball is when he struggles
Finally.Snipes