Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Only if we have money to spend to get forward players in. Gallagher should be loan with option to buy, not 40m and certainly not before bringing in forward players.I’d take a swap of Gordon for Gallagher all day. Especially in a 4-4-2 Onana and Gallagher would be class
You little tinkerHaven’t seen Zaha mentioned on here for a while. As you’re a bit flush now...
.... runs,....hides.
I don't think he will want to join us
...
That's a lot of money for a position that shouldn't be a priority.
That makes no sense at all on any level.
Lol Kopite Kevin what are you doing
40m bid for Conor Gallagher? Good player but not sure we need him
In no way should we be spending all of the Gordon money on that.
What in gods name
Good grief
Not at all what we need
100% agree. We need a bloody striker!
Oh ffs
Looks like it's Gallagher, which makes absolutely no sense.
Conor Gallagher
Really?? How does he fit into this, behind Dom in a 4-4-1-1
I hope Thelwell/Dyche have some sort of masterplan otherwise I just don't understand that and I rate the player.
Everyone was pulling their plods off to Gallagher in the summer...
The boost he gave Palace when he went to them. If he handed us that it'd be money well spent.I don't rate Gallagher at all. Looks out of his depth at Chelsea.
nonsenseIf you offered me Gallagher for Gordon straight swap I'd have kept Gordon
He’s absolutely useless, stay well clear.
How’s that working in a 442 formation though? Genuine questionGarner / Onana with Gallagher in front of them