How could you forget Lacina Traore? He played a massive one game for Everton in 2014
1 appearance, 1 goal. Legend.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
How could you forget Lacina Traore? He played a massive one game for Everton in 2014
I don’t want to talk about thatHow could you forget Lacina Traore? He played a massive one game for Everton in 2014
I was at that game and I’ll never forget me dad sayin ‘he’s [Poor language removed] gash’ just before he scored. A treasured memory.1 appearance, 1 goal. Legend.
As mentioned on the space, there are at least 2 major factors (i) there's no guarantee buying a player is any more effective than receiving a loan player, and if we were to be relegated then buying a permanent player is a much worse decision than returning a loan player, and (ii) there's no guarantee that funding is in place for the next stadium obligations. The 2 factors combined may represent a stronger case for loans rather than purchasesWhy?
Surely some of the Gordon money can be reinvested?
If it can’t, can you explain why it can’t?
Apparently we are after James Maddison, according to some complete strangers on another football forum
This lad was born to play for Everton. Imagine the fume when this happens again.
Surely though the quality of a player bought should be better than one you would get on loan otherwise every team would go for a loan every time , must be desperate now if Everton are challenging footballi science to blag head why there not buying anyone hahahahAs mentioned on the space, there are at least 2 major factors (i) there's no guarantee buying a player is any more effective than receiving a loan player, and if we were to be relegated then buying a permanent player is a much worse decision than returning a loan player, and (ii) there's no guarantee that funding is in place for the next stadium obligations. The 2 factors combined may represent a stronger case for loans rather than purchases
So we shouldn’t buy players because we could get relegated….what?…As mentioned on the space, there are at least 2 major factors (i) there's no guarantee buying a player is any more effective than receiving a loan player, and if we were to be relegated then buying a permanent player is a much worse decision than returning a loan player, and (ii) there's no guarantee that funding is in place for the next stadium obligations. The 2 factors combined may represent a stronger case for loans rather than purchases