So I understand: You'd rather we played chicken with the buying club, knowing they likely have a plan B, C, etc, over a player that had stated his intention to management never to play for us again? Do you honestly believe we could have a) forced him out onto the pitch, and b) got anything resembling a tune out of him (after he'd been crap his entire career to date barring a handful of games)?Dont agree mate, i dont care what he wanted to do, having a warm body is better then no body. 45 mill is useless to us, if we loose 90 mill in revenue in a fall to the championship - the Gordon deal was idiocy if we have no body coming into improve us - we could have waited until today to sanction when we had something lined up or not, regardless of what you think of the player, its stupidity and unnecessary self abuse.
We are going down. If we still had Gordon, we'd still go down. The fact we have conned £45m out of Newcastle for him is literally the only good thing that has happened to us for at least two years.