For those who were thinking this may happen !
AHH..... Good. We can buy him in July though. Always cheaper, just ask forest.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
For those who were thinking this may happen !
It was under 40 for the two with very favourable deal structureThe Chermiti deal doesn't look as bad if we didn't sign Beto. The Beto deal doesn't look as bad without Chermiti. £45 million on 2 backup strikers however looks disastrous.
The 1 season we prepared for DCL to be injured, he doesnt get injured.The Chermiti deal doesn't look as bad if we didn't sign Beto. The Beto deal doesn't look as bad without Chermiti. £45 million on 2 backup strikers however looks disastrous.
For those who were thinking this may happen !
Doesn't currently score eitherThe 1 season we prepared for DCL to be injured, he doesnt get injured.
Everton that.
Their turnover is vastly more than ours and their wage to ratio is only 57%.Overrated...specially on the wages he must be on now. On a decent wage, he could be useful...but not at his reported 135k. West ham wage bill surely must be now significant, and very probably higher than ours.
This fits in with our normal model. Spend decent money, watch them flop and then sell for pennies.This makes me wonder if Beto is a mad little money launder..........£0 upfront, sell him in the summer for probably the same fee? And carry on repaying Udinese in dribs and drabs
About 50 millions more in revenue...wouldn't call that vastly. Especially as they have now their big stadium in London, whilst we are still building ours. A couple of terrible season finishes for us also hasn't helped really. But in normal circumstances, with our new stadium, we should easily be able to match their revenueTheir turnover is vastly more than ours and their wage to ratio is only 53%.
This is what a very well run football club looks like.
View attachment 243234
Nearly 200million spent on Strikers and hes still our first choice.Doesn't currently score either
Im sorry, but you dont consider 50million more a season as vastly?About 50 millions more in revenue...wouldn't call that vastly. Especially as they have now their big stadium in London, whilst we are still building ours. A couple of terrible season finishes for us also hasn't helped really. But in normal circumstances, with our new stadium, we should easily be able to match their revenue
Not really...they have a huge stadium, has been in europe, better finishes than us and they are in London...if we had been in the same position, we would have make that 50 millions easy.Im sorry, but you dont consider 50million more a season as vastly?
I guess we have different ideas.
If we hadnt wasted 600m on buying players and 1billion on player wages we would indeed be in the same position.Not really...they have a huge stadium, has been in europe, better finishes than us and they are in London...if we had been in the same position, we would have make that 50 millions easy.