He spent £35m on Onana, £15m on Maupay and £12m on Chemiti
That’s £52m
We’ve needed a striker for 3 years
striker aside. and of maupay
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
He spent £35m on Onana, £15m on Maupay and £12m on Chemiti
That’s £52m
We’ve needed a striker for 3 years
That makes no sensestriker aside. and of maupay
That makes no sense
So, he’s failed thenhe should of signed a striker
and not neil maupay
People genuinely think this guy is doing a good job.
We heard about recruiting ‘pace and power’ this summer. That was clearly absolute nonsense.
There’s one well know poster who thinks he’s ‘doing bits’ and ‘firing up the bbq’People genuinely think this guy is doing a good job.
We heard about recruiting ‘pace and power’ this summer. That was clearly absolute nonsense.
So, he’s failed then
So last season when he spent £47m on Neal Maupay and Onana instead of a competent strikerIt amazes me that people think ths patsy has a penny to spend! In fact the people on here bashing him are probably Kenwright's multis.
Brighton spent £3m on that Japanese lad; you don’t need millions to find effective footballerson those. how do you know the players he wants now we can’t afford
and if he’s failed why isn’t he sacked
exactly
Brighton spent £3m on that Japanese lad; you don’t need millions to find effective footballers
And he hasn’t been sacked because that would be the 3rd DoF canned from this club in 7 years
Brighton spent £3m on that Japanese lad; you don’t need millions to find effective footballers
And he hasn’t been sacked because that would be the 3rd DoF canned from this club in 7 years